Скачать или смотреть Solving the Oracle Sequence Unsync Issue: A Guide to Avoid Unique Constraint Violations

Learn how to effectively manage `Oracle sequences` to prevent unique constraint violations in your database operations.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/65127475/ asked by the user 'FFF01' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/14034129/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/65129513/ provided by the user 'Boneist' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/4479309/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Oracle sequnce unsync sequence violating uniques

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Oracle Sequence Unsync Issues

Oracle sequences are a fundamental part of database management, especially when it comes to uniquely identifying records in a table. However, problems can arise when multiple users access the same table and insert data simultaneously. A common issue encountered is the violation of unique constraints, particularly when using sequences for primary keys. Let's dive into how to tackle this problem by examining a specific example, understanding the cause, and offering practical solutions.

The Problem Scenario

Consider an example where you have an Oracle table defined as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

You also have a procedure that inserts data into this table:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Imagine two users simultaneously executing this procedure. User One might insert the following records:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Meanwhile, User Two might attempt to insert records as well, but encounters a unique constraint violation:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The key dilemma here is how to manage sequences to avoid such conflicts and ensure the integrity of your data.

Why the Unique Constraint Violation Occurs

The crux of the issue lies in how sequences are managed. If you alter the sequence improperly, such as adjusting its increment to a negative value, you'll start getting lower numbers, potentially overlapping with existing values in your table. This leads to unique constraint violations.

Example Alteration:
After executing EXECUTE TestProcedure('data');, the following adjustments to the sequence were made:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Here’s what happens when you alter the sequence incorrectly:

Changing the increment to a negative value tells the sequence to start issuing lower numbers.

This action contradicts the sequence's purpose of generating unique ascending values.

Solutions to Avoid Unique Constraint Violations

To address the issue and prevent unique constraint violations, keep the following guidelines in mind:

1. Avoid Negative Increments

Never alter the sequence to have a negative increment. Always maintain a positive increment value, which ensures that the next issued number is always higher than the last.

2. Consistent Sequence Usage

Make sure that all inserts into your primary key utilize the same sequence. This approach guarantees that you are generating unique identifiers without the risk of overlap.

3. Monitor Sequence Values

Regularly check the current value of the sequence to ensure it has not been inadvertently altered. You can do this using:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

4. Sequence Caching

Consider using sequence caching to improve performance, but ensure that this does not lead to gaps in your unique identifiers.

5. Proper Sequence Configuration

When creating the sequence, consider setting a high initial value if significant inserts are anticipated in parallel. This way, you can minimize the chance of running into existing identifiers in the table.

Conclusion

Managing Oracle sequences properly is key to ensuring the integrity of your database's unique constraints. By following the guidelines outlined above and understanding the core problem behind unique constraint violations, you can effectively avoid potential pitfalls. Remember, maintaining a consistent approach to your sequence management will inevitably lead to a healthier database and smoother operations.

Implement these strategies in your workflow, and you'll be well on your way to preventing Oracle sequence unsync issues in the future.