Скачать или смотреть Understanding Coroutine Suspension: Can You Change Threads?

Discover the intricacies of Kotlin coroutines and learn if coroutines can suspend and resume on different threads, including implications for variable safety.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/72834086/ asked by the user 'Steve M' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1817031/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/72834177/ provided by the user 'Sergio' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1731626/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Can a coroutine suspend and then resume on a different thread? Are the memory effects of the first thread carried to the second thread?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Coroutine Suspension: Can You Change Threads?

Coroutines are a powerful feature in Kotlin that facilitate asynchronous programming, allowing developers to write code that can be paused and resumed without blocking the main thread. However, a common question arises in the context of Kotlin coroutines—can a coroutine suspend and then resume on a different thread? Furthermore, what are the memory implications of such a switch? Let’s dive into these questions with a clear example and detailed explanations.

The Problem

Consider the following code snippet:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this example, the coroutine is launched on a thread pool (specifically, Dispatchers.Default) that manages multiple threads. When the coroutine reaches the delay(100) function, it temporarily suspends execution. The critical question is whether it is possible for the coroutine to switch to a different thread after this suspension and whether this affects the memory state of the variable a, affecting its correctness when printed.

The Solution

Thread Switching on Suspension

After executing the suspend delay() function, it is indeed possible for the coroutine to continue its execution on a different thread from the Dispatchers.Default thread pool. This is an important feature of coroutines that enhances their flexibility in resource management. With this capability:

The coroutine might suspend execution on one thread,

Only to resume on another thread once the delay has completed.

Memory Safety of Variables

Now, let’s address the safety of the variable a, which is defined and incremented within the coroutine. The excellent news is that there is no need for additional synchronization for the variable a. Here’s why:

Sequential Execution: Code within a coroutine executes sequentially. This means that from the point of variable declaration, through its increment, and into the delay, there can be no interleaving with other coroutine calls. Essentially, the operations involving a are atomic within this coroutine scope.

Happens-Before Guarantees: In the context of Kotlin coroutines, the ‘happens-before’ relationship guarantees that if one operation completes, any subsequent operation (within the same coroutine) will see the effects of the first. This ensures that when println(a) is called after delay, it will always print '1'.

When You Should Use Synchronization

If your variable is shared between multiple coroutines, extra care is required. Here’s a general rule of thumb:

Single Coroutine: No synchronization needed.

Multiple Coroutines: Use an AtomicInteger or other synchronization mechanisms to avoid data races.

Conclusion

To summarize, Kotlin coroutines can suspend and resume on different threads, but the local variables within the coroutine are safe and do not require synchronization as long as they’re used exclusively within that coroutine. This functionality makes coroutines a great tool for building efficient and safe multithreaded applications.

Incorporating Kotlin coroutines into your programming toolkit opens up new possibilities for writing cleaner, more responsive code, while understanding these nuances helps avert common pitfalls in multithreading scenarios.

Thanks for reading! If you have further questions about Kotlin coroutines or multithreading, feel free to reach out in the comments below.