Скачать или смотреть Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’ Proposal Sparks Global Debate Over Power and Access

Reports suggest that former U.S. President Donald Trump is considering the creation of a new international body called the “Board of Peace,” an initiative reportedly aimed at addressing growing global instability and ongoing international conflicts. Though still unofficial, the proposal has already generated widespread discussion among diplomats, policy analysts, and global institutions.
According to leaked draft documents cited in reports, the proposed Board of Peace would introduce a highly centralized governance structure. Under this framework, Trump would serve as the founding chairman, holding authority to approve all major decisions and determine whether participating nations retain their membership status. Such a structure represents a significant departure from traditional multilateral institutions that rely on shared voting power and collective leadership.

One of the most controversial aspects of the leaked charter is the suggestion that countries seeking permanent membership might be required to pay up to one billion dollars. This provision has fueled criticism from observers who argue that the organization could favor wealthier nations while excluding developing countries. Some analysts have gone further, describing the proposal as a potential competitor to the United Nations due to its exclusive design and alternative decision-making model.

Supporters of the concept argue that a streamlined body with decisive leadership could respond more quickly to international crises than existing global institutions. They claim that current systems often suffer from gridlock and inefficiency, limiting their ability to prevent or resolve conflicts in real time.
However, critics have raised concerns about accountability, transparency, and the concentration of power within a single leadership role. Human rights advocates warn that tying influence to financial capacity could undermine principles of equal representation and deepen global inequality. Others fear that such an organization could weaken existing international frameworks rather than complement them.

Amid growing speculation, the White House has denied key elements of the reports. Officials have stated that claims regarding mandatory fees are inaccurate and emphasized that there is no requirement for countries to pay in order to participate in any peace-related initiative. The administration maintains that the leaked draft does not reflect official policy or finalized plans.
Despite these denials, the reports have reignited broader debates about the future of global governance, international security, and how new power structures might emerge in a rapidly changing world. Whether the Board of Peace remains a conceptual idea or evolves into a formal proposal, it has already sparked important conversations about who shapes global order — and how.

#trump
#boardofpeace
#globalpolitics
#worldnews
#internationalsecurity
#geopolitics
#globalgovernance
#unitednations
#breakingnews
#worldaffairs