Скачать или смотреть Segay Bakırdöven - Synchronicity, Parmenides, Causality, Noumena (Podcast)

Synchronicity, Parmenides, Causality, Noumena (Podcast) #carlgustavjung #davidhume #immanuelkant #parmenides #phylosophy #psychology #zenón #quantumphysics
Overview In this video, Segay Bakırdöven, a writer with a background in economics, discusses various philosophical and psychological concepts regarding the nature of existence, time, and perception. He explores whether existence is finite or infinite, aiming to bridge scientific methods with philosophical inquiry.
Key Concepts Discussed:
• Parmenides and the Static Universe: Bakırdöven discusses Parmenides' monism, which views the universe as an infinite, static structure where motion is an illusion. He illustrates this with mathematical paradoxes (like halving the distance to a destination) to suggest that linear movement and time might not exist as we perceive them.
• Time and the Unconscious: The speaker references Henri Bergson’s idea that we exist in "moments" rather than linear time. He connects this to Carl Gustav Jung’s view that linear time is a construct of the ego, whereas the unconscious mind operates outside of space and time.
• Synchronicity (Meaningful Coincidences): A significant portion of the talk focuses on Jung’s concept of synchronicity (e.g., dreaming of an event before it happens). Bakırdöven argues these are not mystical events but natural phenomena that science currently struggles to explain because it relies on linear time and causality. He mentions Wolfgang Pauli’s work on quantum entanglement as potential scientific proof for synchronicity.
• Critique of Dogmatic Science: The speaker criticizes the tendency to treat science as a rigid religion. He emphasizes that intuition is crucial in scientific discovery and that science is a method, not the sole explanation for existence. He suggests that the psyche may exist beyond the physical body, hinting at an infinite form of existence.
• Kant’s Noumena vs. Phenomena: Bakırdöven challenges Immanuel Kant’s assertion that we cannot know Noumena (things-in-themselves). He proposes that by combining sensory inputs—such as listening to music while observing an object—one can create an a priori experience that allows access to the Noumenal world.
• Hume and Causality: The video concludes with David Hume’s critique of causality, which argues that cause and effect are merely mental habits formed by expectation (e.g., expecting the sun to rise). Bakırdöven finds this compatible with Parmenides' view of a static universe where physical causality is an illusion.