Скачать или смотреть Understanding Null Pointers in LLVM: Why Dereferencing a Null Pointer Didn't Crash My Program

Discover why dereferencing a null pointer in LLVM code may not crash your program. Learn about constants and memory loading in a clear and engaging guide.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/62963746/ asked by the user 'Galaxy' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5500589/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/62963830/ provided by the user 'Galaxy' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5500589/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Loading from a Null pointer, why doesn't this crash my program?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Null Pointers in LLVM: Why Dereferencing a Null Pointer Didn't Crash My Program

When programming in LLVM, encountering a null pointer can often lead to confusion. Many developers encounter situations where they believe they are dereferencing a null pointer, expecting their application to crash with a segmentation fault. However, there are cases where this assumption is not accurate. In this post, we will explore a specific example where dereferencing a supposed null pointer did not lead to a crash, clarifying what's happening in the code.

The Problem: Confusion Over a Null Pointer

Consider the following piece of LLVM Intermediate Representation (IR) code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

At first glance, it seems this code is dereferencing a null pointer. However, it does not crash, and there is no segmentation fault. This leads many to ask: Why isn't there an issue?

The Solution: Understanding Constants vs. Pointers

The confusion arises from a misunderstanding of the code's functionality. Let's break down what is really happening:

Defining a Constant

The line:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This line defines a global constant with the value i32 0. Instead of creating a null pointer, it creates a fixed memory location that holds the integer value 0. When the application later attempts to load that value, it actually retrieves 0, not a null pointer.

Loading a Value

When we use the load instruction:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The program is not dereferencing a null pointer; it's simply accessing a known address where the constant resides. The program thus retrieves the value of 0 rather than crashing due to accessing a non-valid memory location.

Equivalent Example

To further illustrate this, consider another code snippet:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this example, we define a global constant i32 5. When running this code, it loads the value 5 into a virtual register, and the program will return 5 as the exit code.

To compile and run this, you would execute:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

In summary, dereferencing a supposed null pointer might seem alarming, but understanding the distinction between pointers and values can clarify much of the confusion. Rather than causing a crash, the program retrieves a valid value stored in memory. Whenever you work with LLVM code, take a moment to investigate and understand what your memory addresses are pointing to, and ensure you're not mistaking constants for null pointers.

By grasping these concepts, you'll become more adept at navigating the complexities of LLVM programming without the fear of unexpected crashes!