Скачать или смотреть Measuring the @ async Runtime of Functions in Julia: A Comprehensive Guide

Learn how to accurately measure the `@ async` runtime in Julia functions with effective techniques and best practices that enhance performance in your programming.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/64454237/ asked by the user 'atachsin' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/10050565/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/64471756/ provided by the user 'Przemyslaw Szufel' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9957710/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How to measure the @ async runtime of functions in Julia?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Measuring the @ async Runtime in Julia: A Comprehensive Guide

When working with asynchronous programming in Julia, particularly when trying to measure the runtime of functions, many users encounter confusion. One common question that arises is: How to accurately measure the @ async runtime of functions in Julia?

In this post, we will explore this issue in detail and provide you with a clear understanding of how to correctly perform asynchronous operations and measure their execution time in Julia.

Understanding Asynchronous Programming in Julia

Asynchronous programming allows you to initiate multiple tasks concurrently without waiting for each one to complete before starting the next. In Julia, this is often done using the @ async macro, which executes a block of code asynchronously.

However, when measuring the runtime of asynchronous functions, users frequently notice discrepancies in their timing results compared to synchronous runs. This is mainly because of how the Julia scheduler manages tasks.

The Problem: Incorrect Measurement Using @ async

Let's say you have the following initial code for loading images asynchronously:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

After executing this, you might observe a runtime that seems unrealistically low, such as 0.000017 seconds, while synchronous loads indicate it takes approximately 0.1 seconds. This discrepancy raises doubts about whether you are correctly measuring the runtime of asynchronous operations.

The Solution: Correctly Measuring Asynchronous Execution

Step 1: Adjust Your Code

To measure the asynchronous operations properly, you should store the results of each load into a vector. Here’s the corrected version of your function:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Key Changes Explained:

Storage of Results: By saving each loaded image into a myimages vector, you ensure that the asynchronous tasks are not lost.

Using @ sync: This ensures that the main thread will wait until all @ async tasks have completed before proceeding.

Step 2: Consider Performance Bottlenecks

It’s worth mentioning that this approach is beneficial when your input/output (IO) operations are slow. However, if you are not hitting any IO bottlenecks, this will only utilize a single thread. Thus, for CPU-bound tasks or heavy computations, consider using threading instead of just async operations.

Step 3: Running Julia with Multiple Threads

To take full advantage of threading in Julia, you need to set the number of threads you want Julia to use.

Before starting Julia, run:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

On Linux, you can do it using:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Then, modify your function to:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Benefits of Threading:

Parallel Execution: When you replace @ async with @ threads, this enables your function to run faster by leveraging multiple CPU cores.

Efficiency: It's crucial to choose the appropriate parallelization method based on whether your operations are IO-bound or CPU-bound.

Conclusion

Measuring the runtime of asynchronous functions in Julia can be tricky, but by following the structured approach outlined above, you can achieve accurate results. Make sure to adjust your code for proper result storage, assess whether IO is your performance bottleneck, and consider threading for better performance.

By implementing these strategies, you will gain confidence in your measurement of asynchronous operations and improve your performance when programming in Julia.



If you have more questions about asynchronous programming or need further clarification, feel free to leave a comment b