Скачать или смотреть Understanding How to Evaluate Function Cost at Compile Time

Explore the misconceptions behind evaluating function costs at compile time in C+ + , and learn how to effectively measure performance through profiling and experimentation.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/62305974/ asked by the user 'Cevik' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/4884156/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/62417347/ provided by the user 'Sorin' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/241013/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: generic way to evaluate a function cost at compile time

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding How to Evaluate Function Cost at Compile Time: A Comprehensive Guide

When developing complex applications in C+ + , especially those involving multidimensional arrays and iterators, one may wonder if it's possible to evaluate the runtime cost of certain operations at compile time. This query navigates us through critical misunderstandings about performance evaluation and the assumptions that often accompany this topic.

The Challenge

Suppose you're working on a multidimensional array iterator, and you're tasked with optimizing how the iterator behaves under different conventions (e.g., row-major vs column-major order). You might think that since certain parameters are known at compile time—such as dimensions, strides, and data types—you could calculate costs associated with different iterations.

However, this assumption is flawed for several reasons.

Misconceptions Surrounding Compile Time Evaluation

Inlined Functions and Execution Context:

When a function is called, the compiler may choose to inline it or keep it separate based on code size and other factors.

This can lead to different performance metrics due to surrounding code, thus, you may experience varying execution times depending on the context.

Instruction Execution:

Modern processors execute instructions out of order and may even parallelize certain operations. As a result, costly instructions (e.g., divisions) might complete faster than expected if they are surrounded by other memory operations.

Processor-Specific Performance:

Performance heavily depends on the specific hardware on which the code runs. Factors like cache sizes, memory speed, and processor architecture significantly influence how your application performs. The compiler has no way to account for these aspects during compile time evaluations.

The Solution: Empirical Evaluation

Given the limitations of compile-time analysis, the best approach for evaluating performance is through empirical profiling:

Step-by-Step Guide to Profiling

Measure Current Performance:

Use profiling tools to assess the current performance of your function within the application. This benchmarking will give you valuable insights into how your code performs in practice.

Experiment with Different Options:

Adjust your iterator implementations and conventions. Measure the performance of these different options individually to determine what offers the best results.

Analyze Results:

Collect data on execution times, memory usage, and other performance metrics. Compare these results against each other to identify the most efficient implementation.

Tools for Profiling

C+ + Profilers: Utilize tools like gprof, Valgrind, or modern built-in profilers offered by IDEs to gather data on how long functions take to execute.

Benchmarking Libraries: Consider using libraries such as Google Benchmark to streamline your performance testing and analysis.

Conclusion

While the idea of evaluating function costs at compile time using solely known data might seem appealing, it's essential to recognize the limitations of this approach. Performance is inherently tied to runtime factors, and empirical profiling is the key to optimizing your code.

By understanding these truths, C+ + developers can make informed choices and strategize their performance tuning efforts more effectively.



By embracing profiling and understanding the dynamics of modern CPU architectures, you can truly optimize your code and ensure the best performance possible.