成为此频道的会员即可获享以下福利：
/ @duwen2024
我讲胡春华，不能平铺直叙、面面俱到地讲，那会非常杂乱和冗长，那样的话对于观众朋友们来说就太痛苦了，更别提艺术性可言。我讲的是捡重点讲，讲胡春华的与众不同之处和她的政治主张以及她的政治手腕。
胡春华曾对身边工作人员说过，中国现在的最大的短板，未来十年的工作重心是法制建设，也就是着力解决社会公平和正义的问题。而下一个十年甚至更长时间将是民生，因为民生问题是社会主义制度的根本问题。而我们的工作重点是，既要加强法制建设，更要着力抓民生建设，我们内蒙古需要把法制和民生这两项工作做在前头。 所以记得他在2010年的全区两会上的闭幕讲话时，就新一年的工作重点问题，他提了几条：第一条居然是加强法制建设，提高立法质量和执法水平问题。这在当时还是绝无仅有的。我想，这就是他的政治路线和方法论，是受到胡锦涛认可或者干脆就是胡锦涛提出来的中国的发展方向和路径问题。当然这也是胡锦涛之所以将他指定为隔代接班人的公开原因所在，因为她的政治路线既中国的未来路线。就是说他的个人执政风格必须要符合中国的政治需求。只有他的个人执政风格符合中国的政治需求了，那么他才可能被确定为储君，未来的接班人。
任亚平就说。大家都是自己人，就别拿老百姓说事了。老百姓是什么？老百姓就是你说啥是啥。记住了，永远不要把老百姓当回事儿。你把它当回事了你就离死不远了。记得当时听的我头皮都发麻。这句话太让我震惊了！怎么能有这么反动的逻辑？在进入监狱以后，我们在职务犯监区。大家也讨论过这个问题。其中有一个局长就谈到一个观点令我记忆犹新。他说他在曾经做镇党委书记的时候。一位很有威望的老村支书告诉他。永远不要把老百姓当人看。永远不要对他们好。当你对他们好的时候，当你往他们嘴里面送糖的时候，小心它咬了你的手指头。他说以他一生与老百姓打交道的亲身经历看。对老百姓越好，老百姓的意见越大。谁对老百姓好，老百姓就告谁。在老百姓眼里，政府官员就没有好的时候。与其没好，倒不如就干脆坏一点，你不应该让他们去敬重你，而是应该让他们怕你。只有他们怕你了。你的位子才稳当。如何让他们怕你呢？就是你要坏，你会报复。你要让他们觉得你坏到了一点底线都没有的时候，你整死他们，他们也不敢与你为敌的时候？你就稳当了。
胡春华一直没说话，沉默了很久，他拿过了那张写着20%方案的纸，思量再三，从会议桌上拿起了一只铅笔，在20后面加了一个0.是的，你没猜错，是200%.怎么样够狠吧。
就是春华夫人的工作怎么办？工资怎么定？符太增提出了两个方案：1、是将胡夫人安排到烟草公司，那里的工资和福利待遇好些。2、安排到内蒙古银行，哪里的福利待遇更好。工资方案呢？不能太多，也不能太少。于是提出了年薪30万、60万、100万或以上三个方案。请示胡春华，胡春华没有直接回答。而是问了一句，我听说内蒙古银行是巴特尔主席一直在抓？符太增说，是的，内蒙古银行的董事长杨成林是巴主席的挚交，交情比较深。胡春华看了他一眼，就没再说什么。符太增心里没底，又去请示春华夫人，胡夫人毫不客气，我们家的家庭负担比较重，老胡家里穷，老家的穷亲戚多，我的工资不要太高，也不要太低，别让我们家借钱度日就行。符太增一听明白了。他将春华夫人安排到了内蒙古农村信用社，密薪制，谁也不让知道。记得哪会儿农信社正在讨论转型组建村镇银行，工作原因我遇到了他们的一个负责人，我就问了一句，第一夫人在你们那里工资多少？你悄悄告诉我，于是他悄悄告诉我说“这事儿不让说”。但他的手上坐了一个似是而非的6的手势，我猜，应该是60万吧。
Ruthless Figure: Hu Chunhua 7 (Livelihood)
When talking about Hu Chunhua, I focus on the key points, highlighting his uniqueness, political stance, and tactics. Hu Chunhua once mentioned to his staff that China's biggest shortfall currently and the focus for the next decade should be on the construction of the legal system, aiming to address issues of social fairness and justice. The following decade, and perhaps even longer, would center on livelihood issues, as these are fundamental to the socialist system. Therefore, our primary tasks are to strengthen the legal system and to focus on livelihood construction. In Inner Mongolia, we need to prioritize these two areas.
In his closing speech at the 2010 regional conference, Hu Chunhua listed several key areas for the coming year's work. The first point was to strengthen the legal system and improve the quality of legislation and law enforcement, which was unprecedented at the time. This reflects his political line and methodology, likely endorsed or proposed by Hu Jintao as China's developmental direction and path. This is also the public reason why Hu Jintao designated him as a successor, because his political route aligns with China's future path. His personal governing style must meet China's political needs to be recognized as a future leader.
Ren Yaping once said, "We're all in this together, so let's not use the people as an excuse. What are the people? They are whatever you say they are. Remember, never take the people seriously. If you do, you're not far from death." I was shocked to hear this. How could someone have such a reactionary logic? After entering prison, in the ward for officials, we discussed this issue. One director shared a memorable view. He said that when he was a town party secretary, a respected village party secretary told him, "Never regard the people as human. Never treat them well. When you treat them well and give them benefits, they might bite your hand." Based on his experience, the better you treat the people, the more complaints they have. Whoever treats the people well gets reported by them. In the eyes of the people, there's no good official. It's better to be outright bad. You shouldn't make them respect you; you should make them fear you. Only when they fear you is your position secure. To make them fear you, you need to be ruthless and retaliatory. When they believe you have no bottom line, they won't dare to oppose you, and your position will be stable.
Hu Chunhua remained silent for a long time before picking up a pencil and adding a zero to the "20%" on a piece of paper, turning it into "200%." Yes, you guessed it right, 200%. How ruthless is that?
Информация по комментариям в разработке