Скачать или смотреть They Mocked His 'Mail-Order' Rifle — Until He K*lled 11 Japanese Snipers in 4 Days

#ww2records #ww2history #wwii
Why Second Lieutenant John George brought his own civilian hunting rifle to Guadalcanal in 1943 — and proved every military expert wrong about what wins sniper duels. This World War 2 story reveals how a mail-order sporting rifle changed Pacific Theater tactics forever.

January 22, 1943. Lieutenant John George, 132nd Infantry Regiment, crouched in ruins west of Point Cruz. Japanese snipers had killed fourteen Americans in seventy-two hours. George aimed through a Lyman Alaskan scope mounted on his Winchester Model 70 — a civilian bolt-action hunting rifle he'd bought with two years of National Guard pay. Every officer in his battalion called it a toy. Captain Morris had ordered him to leave the "mail-order sweetheart" in his tent and carry a real weapon. His fellow platoon leaders said a sporting rifle had no place in modern warfare.

They were all wrong.

What George discovered that morning wasn't about firepower. It was about precision in a way that contradicted everything the Army taught about semi-automatic superiority. His bolt-action Winchester fired slower than the standard M1 Garand but grouped tighter at three hundred yards. What happened in Point Cruz groves over the next four days would change how battalion commanders viewed individual marksmanship. And the technique George used would spread through the Pacific Theater in ways no one expected.

This unofficial innovation saved an estimated two thousand lives before appearing in any training manual. The principles discovered in those coconut groves continue to influence US military sniper doctrine today.

🔔 Subscribe for more untold WW2 stories: Inside World War II
👍 Like this video if you learned something new
💬 Comment below: What other WW2 tactics should we cover?

#worldwar2 #ww2history #ww2 #wwii #ww2records

⚠️ Disclaimer: This is entertainment storytelling based on WW2 events from
internet sources. While we aim for engaging narratives, some details may be
inaccurate. This is not an academic source. For verified history, consult
professional historians and archives. Watch responsibly.