Скачать или смотреть Should I Use More Universal Variable Aliases or Type-Specific Variables in C?

Exploring the best practices in C programming regarding variable alias types: Should you stick to universal types like `uint8_t`, or use specific types required by functions?
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/69853406/ asked by the user 'Imeguras' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/14677542/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/69853521/ provided by the user 'dbush' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1687119/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Should I use a more universal variable alias/type or use the variable type's that the functions i will use take?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Introduction to the Problem

When diving into C programming, variables play a crucial role in managing data but can often lead to confusion, especially when choosing variable types. Many programmers are faced with the decision of whether to use universal variable aliases, such as those provided in stdint.h (like uint8_t), or to stick to the standard variable types like char, short, int, and long. This dilemma is intensified by the fact that the size of standard types can vary across different machines, adding complexity to the decision-making process.

In my own journey to improve my C skills, I leaned towards using these aliases for cleanliness and clarity. Declaring types with specific byte sizes allows me to avoid ambiguity about storage allocation, which can differ based on the machine's architecture. However, I soon realized that my approach resulted in warnings from my debugger due to pointer type mismatches, leading me to ponder whether this preference was impairing my code readability and functionality.

The Question

As I tackled a current project involving a variety of functions with different pointer expectations, I found myself questioning the best practice. Should I continue using universal variable aliases that provide consistency throughout my project, or should I revert to using the specific types required by the functions? This meant potentially using several different aliases across my codebase, which could lead to inconsistency and confusion.

To put it simply:

Is it better to use specific aliases based on how a variable will be used, or is sticking to a more universal approach advantageous for project consistency?

Example Code

To illustrate my dilemma, consider the following snippet of code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this code, I use int8_t for the pop pointer, and size_t for readnum. While I chose int8_t based on the anticipated parameter type it might need for future functions, size_t serves well due to its capability of handling the maximum array size.

The Solution

General Guidelines:

Use Exact Width Types: When you need total control over the variable size, are doing bit manipulation, or are handling raw data, prefer the exact width types found in stdint.h. These give you a clear understanding of memory allocation and representation.

Use Base Types for Function Compatibility: When interacting with APIs or libraries that specify the use of base types like long or char, stick to what is expected by the function. For instance, if a function requires a long, passing an int64_t is improper and can lead to unexpected behavior.

Beware of Pointer Mismatch Warnings: As seen from the warnings you encountered, converting between signed and unsigned types can lead to warnings due to potential differences in implementation. For instance, using char could be signed or unsigned, leading to mismatch warnings when passing int8_t * to a function expecting char *.

Don’t Overthink the Type: In most situations, it's acceptable to cast types when necessary, particularly when you know that the data will not produce harmful side-effects.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the choice between the universal variable aliases and the more specific types is influenced by the context in which they will be used. If clarity and precision in size are paramount, stick with the exact width types. Conversely, choose the types expected by the functions you are using to avoid compatibility issues.

By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, you'll be better equipped to make informed decisions in your C programming journey, ensuring both robust functionality and c