Скачать или смотреть Using Validation Pipes for Service Functions in NestJS: What You Need to Know

Explore the limitations of using `Validation Pipes` in NestJS service functions and learn alternative validation methods to ensure your data integrity.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/69587669/ asked by the user 'Alexy' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/11164691/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/69587859/ provided by the user 'Jay McDoniel' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9576186/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: UsePipes for a service function in NestJs

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the Role of Validation Pipes in NestJS

NestJS is a powerful framework for building scalable Node.js applications. One of its standout features is the seamless integration of validation pipes, which allow developers to enforce data integrity by validating incoming data to various endpoints. However, many developers often wonder whether they can apply these validation pipes directly within service functions.

In this guide, we'll analyze the question of whether it's possible to use a ValidationPipe in a service function in NestJS and explore the best practices for handling validation in such scenarios.

The Problem at Hand

We encounter a common situation when trying to validate data within a service function using a validation pipe. The following code snippet illustrates the challenge:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

While the validation pipe works perfectly for the controller endpoints, it does not seem to have any effect when invoked within the service function. Consequently, if any required data is missing, no exception is thrown, and the integrity of the data being processed cannot be guaranteed.

Why Validation Pipes Don’t Work in Service Functions

To understand why ValidationPipe fails in service functions, we need to dive a bit deeper into how NestJS processes routes and metadata:

Middleware Setup: When NestJS initializes, it sets up routes, treating them as middleware with the underlying HTTP adapter. This setup allows NestJS to manage various metadata linked to each route – including guards, interceptors, and pipes.

Route Handlers: Once the controller’s route handler method is called, it operates outside the reach of NestJS, meaning the validation pipe can no longer be applied. These handlers process data independently, missing any validation that might otherwise prevent issues related to incorrect or incomplete data.

This behavior is primarily due to the way @ UsePipes() establishes metadata that is utilized by NestJS during the initial setup but does not extend into service logic.

Alternative Approach to Data Validation in Services

Fortunately, there are efficient alternatives for validating data directly within your service functions.

Step 1: Use class-transformer and class-validator

Instead of relying on the ValidationPipe, you can manually incorporate transforms and validations by using the class-transformer and class-validator libraries. Here’s how to proceed:

Import the Necessary Functions:

You need to import transform from class-transformer.

Import validate from class-validator.

Manual Validation:

Directly perform the validation using these methods in your service function.

Example Implementation

Here’s how you might refactor your create function to perform validations manually:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Benefits of Manual Validation

Control: You maintain control of the validation process and can customize how you handle validation errors.

Flexibility: You can choose to validate in different contexts or situations without relying on pipeline mechanics.

Clarity: Reduces the complexity of relying on decorators and allows for straightforward logic flow.

Conclusion

While using Validation Pipes directly in service functions of NestJS is not feasible due to the framework's design, you can achieve similar outcomes with class-transformer and class-validator. By applying these libraries in your service layer, you ensure that your data maintains integrity while keeping your application robust and reliable.

In summary, always assess the context of your validations, and utilize NestJS's powerful validation capabilities where they fit best to keep your application running smoothly.