Скачать или смотреть How to Effectively Transition from a Mutable to an Immutable Class in Legacy Java Code

Discover practical strategies for replacing mutable classes with immutability in Java, focusing on thoughtful adaptations for legacy code.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/64872395/ asked by the user 'MadScientist' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1463557/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/64872957/ provided by the user 'Hulk' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2513200/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Changing an immutable class in legacy code

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Transitioning from Mutable to Immutable Classes in Legacy Java Code

In the world of software development, particularly in Java, embracing immutability can lead to more predictable and safer code. However, when dealing with legacy code that relies on mutable classes, the transition to immutability can be fraught with challenges. This guide will explore a typical scenario where you'd want to replace a mutable class with an immutable one, and offer a practical solution to facilitate this transition while maintaining adaptability and code integrity.

The Problem: Legacy Mutable Class

Consider the legacy OldValue class featured below:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This mutable class allows its internal state to be changed freely through the setValue method, making it less predictable in shared environments.

The Desired Change: Introducing an Immutable Class

To improve code quality, we want to replace OldValue with an immutable counterpart, NewValue:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

However, many parts of the existing codebase are tightly coupled with OldValue, using its mutability in various ways, which complicates the process of switching over to NewValue.

Challenges with Legacy Code

Here’s a sample of the legacy code that interacts with OldValue:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Altering this legacy code to use NewValue directly could lead to significant rewrites and increased risk of introducing bugs.

The Solution: Adapter Pattern

Instead of modifying all existing code, a more sustainable approach is to create an adapter that facilitates the conversion between OldValue and NewValue. This allows legacy code to remain unchanged while still providing a pathway to utilize immutability.

Step 1: Create a Legacy Value Adapter

We can now define a LegacyValueAdapter as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 2: Integration and Documentation

Using the Adapter Methods: Developers can now interact with the legacy code through these adapter methods, ensuring that the immutable NewValue objects can be adapted back to mutable OldValue when necessary.

Documentation: Clearly document these methods to highlight their purpose and limitations. Indicate that they should be used exclusively for interfacing with legacy code and consider marking them as deprecated once a full migration is feasible.

Step 3: Considerations for More Complex Classes

If OldValue carries more sophisticated behavior or methods, you might consider an alternative strategy where OldValue wraps an instance of NewValue. However, for straightforward cases, sticking with simple conversion could be the most efficient path.

Final Advice: Avoid Reflection Hacks

While it might be tempting to implement "evil" methods that manipulate NewValue directly, engaging in reflections or hacks undermines the key advantages of immutability—i.e., predictability and thread-safety. Such approaches would violate the expectations of users relying on immutability, thus introducing risks of race conditions and obscure bugs.

Conclusion

Transitioning from mutable to immutable classes in legacy code is a delicate process. By employing the adapter pattern, we can bridge the gap between the needs of the legacy system and the benefits of immutability. This strategy not only preserves the integrity of the codebase but also enables developers to incrementally improve the overall design without introducing chaos.

In an ever-evolving software ecosystem, understanding how to handle legacy code will empower developers to write cleaner, safer, and more maintainable code.