Скачать или смотреть Minimize Downtime of Hive Tables with Spark saveAsTable in Overwrite Mode

Learn strategies to effectively `minimize downtime` of Hive tables using Spark's saveAsTable method. Discover the best practices for ensuring data availability during updates.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/68577456/ asked by the user 'Srivatsan Nallazhagappan' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2033373/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/68582925/ provided by the user 'thebluephantom' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/6933993/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Minimize downtime of the hive table with Spark saveAsTable + overwrite mode

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Minimize Downtime of Hive Tables with Spark saveAsTable in Overwrite Mode

Managing data availability in your Hive tables during updates is a critical concern for many data professionals. If you're using Apache Spark's saveAsTable method in overwrite mode, you may have faced downtime issues where the table becomes unavailable while new data is being written. This guide will explore effective strategies to handle the situation and minimize downtime, ensuring your Impala users can access the data they need during the refresh process.

The Problem: Unavailable Tables during Spark Job

When executing a Spark job that utilizes the saveAsTable method in overwrite mode, many users notice that the table becomes unavailable the moment the job starts. This behavior is especially troublesome for workloads where data freshness is crucial but users need to access data throughout the loading process. This issue persists regardless of whether the Hive table is external or managed, leaving you with two significant challenges:

Users querying stale data while updates are being executed.

The table being truncated immediately when the operation begins, leading to a moment of zero availability.

The Solution: Strategies to Minimize Downtime

While there isn't a direct out-of-the-box solution in Spark or Hive for this problem, there are several effective approaches you can take to mitigate downtime during table updates. Let's break these down into two primary strategies:

Strategy 1: Versioning with Control Tables

Append Instead of Overwrite:
Rather than overwriting the existing table, consider appending new data. This prevents immediate truncation and keeps the current version available for querying.

Implement Version Control:

Create a control table that maintains records of the data versions.

Each new dataset written to the Hive table can be tagged with a version number.

Users can query against a view that exposes the most recent version.

Cleanup Old Versions:

After confirming that the new version is being utilized, clean up older versions periodically to manage space and maintain performance.

Strategy 2: Use Dual Tables with a Switch Mechanism

This strategy involves creating two separate tables that hold the data version. Here’s how you can set it up:

Create Two Tables:

Let's call them active_table and staging_table.

Users will always query the active_table for data access.

Load Data into the Staging Table:

Execute Spark jobs to load new data into the staging_table while leaving the active_table accessible.

Switching the Active Table:

Once the load is complete, swap the tables by adjusting a view or renaming the tables.

Reference the new data in the active_table for users while still allowing old queries to proceed without interruption.

Cleanup:

As with the first strategy, clean up any obsolete data from the staging_table after successful data swapping.

Conclusion

Creating an environment where your Hive tables remain available amidst data updates is entirely feasible with the right strategies. Both versioning and dual table approaches ensure that users can continue their queries undeterred while new data is being refreshed in the background. By implementing these strategies, you can enhance user satisfaction with minimal impact on your data availability.

Choosing the right method for your workflow will depend on your data architecture and user needs, but either approach can significantly reduce downtime in most scenarios. Let's keep your data flowing smoothly!