Скачать или смотреть Understanding git log Outputs: When Branches Seem Merged

Explore the intricacies of `git log` output in Git, especially why branches might appear in a linear fashion. Learn how to visualize and analyze commit histories effectively!
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/70252806/ asked by the user 'TMOTTM' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1289801/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/70252951/ provided by the user 'Inigo' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/8910547/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: This git log output shows two branches as if they weren't branches? Please explain

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding git log Outputs: When Branches Seem Merged

When working with Git, it's not uncommon to encounter confusing scenarios—such as seeing two branches listed together in your log output as if they’re not actually separate branches. If you’re running the command git log --oneline and noticing that two branches, such as feature/XY and feature/XY-refactor, are right next to each other, you may be wondering what this means. Let's explore this phenomenon in detail and clarify how Git structures its commit history.

The Scenario

In your case, you have the following branches:

feature/XY - This is the branch you currently have checked out.

feature/XY-refactor - A separate branch that was created (branched off) from feature/XY.

When you execute the command to view your Git logs, you see output indicating that these two branches are positioned closely in the order of commits. This output can lead to questions about the relationship between the branches and how they are being reflected in the log.

Default Behavior of git log

When you run the command git log, Git retrieves all commits reachable from your specified commit, which by default is HEAD (the latest commit of the currently checked-out branch). Thus, running:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

is equivalent to running:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This means that since feature/XY is currently checked out, you will see the commits associated with that branch, including any merges or direct parent-child relationships with other branches.

Understanding the Output

Linear Visual Representation

The output you see indicates that your first commit in the log (9feb11a) is from the feature/XY branch, while the next (d250b90) is from the feature/XY-refactor branch. This suggests that:

The feature/XY-refactor branch has been integrated into feature/XY.

The commits are displayed in chronological order without any visual indication of their branching lineage unless you explicitly tell Git to show that information.

Enhancing Visibility with --graph

To better understand the relationships between your branches, use the --graph option with git log like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This command provides a visual representation of commit history, showing how branches diverged or merged.

Example Outputs

If feature/XY-refactor was merged back:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

If feature/XY was rebased onto feature/XY-refactor:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Clarifying Multiple Commit Histories

It's important to note that sometimes you may have several distinct commit histories without a shared base. In such situations, git log --graph can also help, although it might not clearly show these relationships if the branches in question do not originate from a common root.

Exploring Further

You can customize the command to investigate each branch's history individually using:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

To view all branches, the command is:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Detailed Log Insights

For developers who want comprehensive commit details, here is the more verbose command that reveals authorship, timestamps, and decorations:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

Understanding git log output, especially how it presents branches and their relationships, can enhance your clarity when managing Git repositories. By leveraging the --graph option, you can visualize the commit history, uncovering the intricate web of branches, merges, and modifications. Don't hesitate to experiment with the various log comma