Скачать или смотреть How to Append an Element to a List in Prolog's forall Statement

Discover an effective approach to append elements using Prolog's `findall` for efficient list handling and sorting.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/70413113/ asked by the user 'William Chretien' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/17353676/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/70413857/ provided by the user 'William Chretien' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/17353676/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How to append an element to a list in a forall?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Append an Element to a List in Prolog's forall Statement

When programming in Prolog, you may encounter the need to gather data into a list dynamically, especially when working within predicates that iterate over conditions, such as forall. A common task arises when you want to append an element to a list and then perform functions like sorting or extracting the smallest value. This guide will provide a clear solution to accomplishing this with a focus on how to use the findall predicate effectively.

The Problem

Let's consider a scenario where you want to append distances calculated between points (S1, S2) to a list, and then sort this list to find the smallest distance (W). In your initial attempt to achieve this, you used forall, along with the append function, but ran into difficulties. Here is the code you started with:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Issues with Initial Code

Inefficient List Handling: Using append in this case creates unnecessary complexity and does not work as expected when integrating with forall.

Variable Binding: The way variables are linked might lead to unexpected behavior.

The Solution: Using findall

After identifying the inefficiencies, the solution is to utilize Prolog’s findall predicate to collect all the distances into a list before sorting it. This approach simplifies the process and enhances performance. Here is the revised and effective code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Explanation of the Solution

Let's break down this code step-by-step:

Using findall:

The first argument (D) is the item to be collected.

The second argument is the goal that generates items. In this case, it computes the distance D between S1 and S2 for each pair.

The third argument (Ls) is the list that will accumulate all distances produced by the goal.

findall effectively constructs this list in one go, capturing all outputs without manual appending.

Sorting the List:

The sort predicate is then called on Ls, which sorts the collected distances in ascending order.

The smallest distance is then extracted; by using [W|_], we bind the smallest value to W, discarding the rest of the sorted list.

Conclusion

By transitioning from forall to findall, you can efficiently gather and manage the distances in Prolog, paving the way for easy sorting and retrieval of essential values. This method not only streamlines your code but also enhances its readability and performance.

If you face similar tasks in Prolog, remember this efficient pattern of using findall combined with list manipulation predicates like sort. Happy coding!