Between Law and Narrative in the Talmud

Part of the series "The Space In Between: Thresholds and Borders in Jewish Life and Thought"

With Dr. Sarah Wolf, Assistant Professor of Talmud and Rabbinics, JTS

The Talmud has classically been thought of as containing two genres: halakhah, or law, meaning the often complex, technical, even arcane back-and-forth arguments about various legal scenarios and rulings; and aggadah, or narrative, meaning the stories about Rabbis and their adventures with each other, Romans, supernatural beings, and other characters. This session will present the history of the law vs. narrative distinction in reference to the Talmud, and will show how this categorization became central to how Jews think about Jewish texts and Jewish learning more generally. We will then consider the limits of this binary by looking at some texts from the Talmud that seem to defy categorization, raising the question of what possibilities open up when we read Jewish legal texts as literature.
REFERENCES
Hayim Nahman Bialik, “Halachah and Aggadah” https://masorti.org/wp-content/upload...

Robert Cover, “Nomos and Narrative,” in Robert Cover, Narrative, Violence and the Law: The Essays of Robert Cover (Martha Minnow and Austin Sarat, eds. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1992)

Barry Wimpfheimer, Narrating the Law (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011), Chapter 2

Alyssa Gray, “The Halakhic Canon as Literature: Reading for Jewish Ideas and Values,” CCAR Journal Spring 2020

ABOUT THE SERIES
We are living in an undefined time: our daily existence is no longer dominated by the pandemic, yet neither have we settled into a new normal. This sense of being in transition—neither here nor there— can feel destabilizing; but is the time in between really temporary, or are we always living in between moments, identities, and phases of life?

In this series, JTS scholars will delve into the idea of liminality—the time or space in between—which we encounter often in Jewish ritual, identity, law, and life. Join us to consider what these many manifestations of “in-between-ness” can teach us about ourselves and about Judaism, and to explore how we might find strength and meaning in an orientation not of “either/or” but of “both/and.”