Discover how to effectively sort an array of classes in Swift, especially when dealing with optional properties like integers. Learn the proper technique to avoid common errors!
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63458609/ asked by the user 'soleil' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1151334/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63458704/ provided by the user 'EmilioPelaez' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/725628/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Swift - How to sort and array by optional property
Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Sort an Array by an Optional Property in Swift
Sorting arrays is a common task in programming, and in Swift, it can be straightforward when dealing with standard properties. However, when optional properties come into play, things can get a bit tricky. In this guide, we will address a common problem faced by Swift developers: how to sort an array of classes by an optional integer property. If you've ever encountered the error message about binary operators and optionals, this guide is for you!
The Problem: Sorting with Optionals
Imagine you have a class Cat, which contains an optional property called order. The definition might look something like this:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Now, consider you have an array of Cat instances that you want to sort by their order properties:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
When you run this code, you may encounter the following error:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
This error arises because you are trying to compare optional integers directly, which Swift does not allow. So, what is the proper way to handle this situation?
The Solution: Providing a Default Value
To properly sort an array with optional values, you can use a technique that involves providing a default value when the optional is nil. Here’s how you can do it using Swift’s nil-coalescing operator (??), which conveniently allows you to set a default value if the optional is nil.
Step-by-Step Solution
Use the nil-coalescing operator: This operator lets you specify a default value for your optional. If order is nil, it will use the specified default value (in this case, .min, which represents the smallest integer value possible).
Update your sorting code: Replace your original sorting code with the same logic using ??:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Explanation of the Code
$0.order ?? .min: This means, if $0.order (the order of the first Cat in the pair) is nil, use .min as the default value.
$1.order ?? .min: The same logic applies here for the second Cat.
Why .min?
Using .min ensures that any Cat that does not have an assigned order value will be treated as having the lowest possible value when sorting. This way, they will appear at the end of the sorted list, which is typically the desired behavior.
Conclusion
Sorting an array of objects by an optional property in Swift might seem daunting at first, but understanding how to handle optionals effectively makes this task manageable. Remember to leverage the nil-coalescing operator to provide default values, ensuring your code runs smoothly without errors.
Now, you can confidently sort your Cat objects (or any other objects with optional properties) without stumbling over common pitfalls. Happy coding!
Информация по комментариям в разработке