Скачать или смотреть Drafting/Writing statement u/s 65B Evidence Act,Landmark Judgements on 65B Electronic Evidence(2019)

This video by Bivas Chatterjee covers the following:
Appreciation of electronic Evidence, How to draft or write statement , #HowToWriteCertificate65BofIndianEvidenceAct,
#HowToWriteStatement65BIndianEvidenceAct
#SomeLandMarkJudgementOnCyberElectronicEvidece
#HowCanIProveElectronicEvidence
#AudioVideoEvidence, various Hon'ble Supreme Court of India Judgement on #65BofEvidenceAct, #ElectronicEvidenceLaws of England, France and USA, Compliance of 65B Statement is not mandatory, Relevancy and Admissibility of digital/electronic evidence, understanding the concept of electronic evidence, Cyber Forensics, #AdmissibilityofElectronicEvidenceInCourtRoom, What is digital/Electronic Evidence under Evidence Act, Cyber Laws/Law, Information Technology Act, 2000, Types of Electronic Evidence, how to prove mobile recording, How to prove electronic record in Indian Court Room, challenge of electronic evidence, section 65B IEA, Evidence Act Electronic Record, Can Voice Recording be Used As Evidence In Courts in India..? Can Voice Recording be Used As Evidence In Courts - क्या कोर्ट में ऑडियो वीडियो को सबूत माना जायेगा? Using Electronic Evidence at Trial, Presenting electronic and computer forensics evidence in court, Mirror Image, Electronic Evidence: Digital Cameras, Audio/Video and Computers, Complexity of electronic evidence discovery, digital evidence collection and preservation, digital evidence management, Digital evidence in Criminal and Civil cases, , Collecting digital evidence, preservation of digital/electronic evidence, investigation, investigation with electronic evidence, Cyber Forensic Investigation, digital evidence collection and preservation, Computer Evidence Collection and Preservation, Crime Scene Processing and Evidence Collection, Evidence Collection & Preservation in Crime Scene, How to Preserve Pen Drive, Preservation of digital evidence, Computer Evidence Collection and Preservation, digital forensic tutorial, electronic/digital evidence course, Collecting and Preserving Digital Evidence, Section 3 of Indian Evidence Act, Locard's exchange principle, Chain-of-custody, Every contact leaves a trace, Justice Stephen Breyer, Science in the Courtroom, Universality of electronic evidence, electronic record, data, electronic form evidence, Welcoming Electronic Records/Evidence Authentication of Electronic Records, Electronic Signature Authentication, Legal Recognition of E-Records, Legal recognition of Electronic Signature, Validity of contracts formed through electronic means, Legal Recognition of Electronic Records, Section 4 of IT Act, Nature of Electronic Evidence, Relevance and Admissibility, Anvar P.V. vs. P.K. Basheer and Others (2014) 10 SCC 473, relevancy and admissibility, Section 59 of Evidence Act, contents of documents or electronic records, Section 65A of Indian Evidence, Interpretation of statute, Section 65B of Evidence Act, Some #formatof65BCertificate u/s 65B of Evidence Act issued in relation to the CD titled CCTV Footage, CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 65B OF EVIDENCE ACT of PRINTOUTS OF DOWNLOADED COPIES, Certificate u/s 65B of Evidence Act issued in relation to the Printout of the downloaded copy, What is in 65B of EVIDENCE ACT, Section 88A and 90A of EVIDENCE ACT, Nature of digital evidence, US v. Bonallo, possible to alter data contained in a computer, judgements in accepting Electronic Evidence & its Relevancy & Process of Admissibility, Ram Singh & Ors vs Col Ram, R. M. Malkani vs State Of Maharashtra, N. Sri Rama Reddy, etc. v. V.V.Giri, State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu alias Afsan Guru, Tukaram S. Dighole v. Manikrao Shivaji Kokate, An electronic record.. shall not be admitted in evidence unless the requirements under Section 65B are satisfied, Generalia specialibus non derogant, special law prevail over general law, Tomaso Bruno & Anr vs State Of U.P, Mohd. Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab vs. State of Maharashtra, Sonu alias Amar vs State of Haryana, K. Madhav Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh, Shafhi Mohammad vs The State Of Himachal, Requirement of certificate under 65B(h) is not always mandatory, By publishing every video in this channel, I am not in any way soliciting work and advertising and by accessing, opening and reading this post the readers should understand that:
• there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website;
• any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and any transmission, receipt or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
The information provided under this website is for informational purposes only, should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement and in cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.

Gmail: [email protected]