Скачать или смотреть Do Chinese Claims on Tibet have any Historic Basis?

The people in question, Tibetans dont think of themselves as Chinese. China has no moral or legal claim on Tibet except what is based on illegal military occupation, the largest imperialist land grab carried out in Twentieth Century.

This video examines chinese claims on Tibet using historic facts. Yuan empire was a Mongol one not Chinese. In fact Kublai Khan invaded, defeated Chinese and occupied China. And historically Southern chinese and northern ones have not been the same. China itself as an entity is rather new.

Qing rule was a Manchu rule and their control over Tibet was rather notional. Sun Yat Sen talked of freeing China from Manchu Rule. Once Manchu empire dissolved, Tibet remained free..as free as the chinese.

And it is amazing that - chinese communists, that talk about peace, civilisation, sensitivity and culture all of which they lack. There are courageous exceptions; but most Chinese seem unfortunately a classic example of Orwellian automons.

Culture of Chinese rulers and their fascist behavior with Tibetians seems to be as monochromatic as that of Hongkong produced violent kung fu movies. Claiming land and sovereignity over other nations is an imperialist act and exercising soverignity is clearly occupation.

For truthful information on Tibet, as different from chinese propoganda lies, visit http://www.friendsoftibet.org, http://www.savetibet.org.

Current borders of some of the nations shown in the maps are not accurate.

(Below are extremely distressing pictures of dead Tibetians shot by Chinese. Viewer Discretion advised for viewing the site below
http://www.tchrd.org/press/2008/pr200...)

SOME PLAIN TALK TO XINHUA AND CCTV, WORLD'S LARGEST BROADCASTER OF DOCTORED NEWS AND LIES:


1. If there is a power that wants to block information, then we should assume this power is bad.

2. If this power actually blocked the information, then this power should be assumed to be worse.

3. If the power which blocked information now publishes only one-sided information, then we should assume this information is false.

4. For all untrue information, the power which blocks information should be held most responsible.

5. The power which blocks information has no credibility to judge related information that flows around.

6. Information blocking is the only reason for making the divide deeper and the situation worse, since people in different positions are all talking from their own perspectives, and cannot be verified.

7. Ultra-nationalism is an emotion, not reason; therefore censorship is a bed for such emotion, fostering extreme Chinese Emotions/intolerance.

This extreme jingoist emotion helps chinese government, in retaining power.

9. Only sufficient information and sufficient expression can dissolve such extreme emotion. Trying to control so-called "dangerous speech" is the biggest and greatest danger.

10. Therefore, allowing the media to freely enter Tibet to report is a critical to help resolve the issue.

(Chinese hands being bloody, dont know if Censorship will be lifted any time soon)