Скачать или смотреть Understanding Operator Overloading: Fixing the *this Object Issue in C+ +

Learn how to correctly implement `operator+ ` and `operator=` in C+ + to avoid unexpected values in your vector operations.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63246792/ asked by the user 'SH Chen' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/14019718/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63251316/ provided by the user 'Jared Dobry' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12585580/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Operator Overloading: Failed to return an object through *this

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Operator Overloading: Fixing the *this Object Issue in C+ +

Operator overloading in C+ + allows developers to define custom behaviors for operators based on the objects of user-defined types. However, sometimes we run into issues, especially when returning objects through *this. In this guide, we will tackle a common problem faced by many C+ + developers when implementing operator overloading, specifically in the context of a vector class.

The Problem

Imagine you have a vector class defined as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

You’ve written implementations for the operator+ and operator= functions. However, when you try to use them, you end up with unexpected values returned in the resulting vector. Let’s dive into the specifics and see how we can resolve this issue.

Understanding the Mistakes

The operator+ Implementation

The original implementation of operator+ looked like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The Issues:

Modifying the Original Object: The purpose of operator+ is to create a new vector that represents the sum of two vectors. However, the current code modifies this (the original object) instead of creating a new object.

Return Value: Returning *this means you're returning the original object that has been modified, not the new vector.

The operator= Implementation

In your operator= definition, there was also an issue:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The Issues:

Returning a Reference: The return type should be Vector& instead of Vector.

Overly Cautious Check: The check for this != &v is not necessary in this context since you’re already managing memory correctly.

The Solution

Revised operator+

Here is how you should implement operator+ :

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Creating a New Object: The code now creates a new vector called out that stores the results of the addition without modifying this.

Revised operator=

Here’s the corrected implementation for operator=:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Returning a Reference: This method now correctly returns a reference to the current object, allowing for chaining assignments (like v1 = v2 = v3).

Conclusion

Operator overloading can be a powerful tool when used correctly, but it requires careful attention to detail to ensure that the behaviors are exactly what you need. By modifying your operator+ and operator= methods to correctly handle object creation and memory management, you can avoid unexpected results and get your C+ + vector operations working seamlessly. Happy coding!