RESCUE CASE - LIMITATION ON THE SCOPE OF VOLENTI NON-FIT INJURIA

Описание к видео RESCUE CASE - LIMITATION ON THE SCOPE OF VOLENTI NON-FIT INJURIA

1. Haynes v. Harwood
2. Wagner v. International Railway
Cardozo, J. said : "Danger invites rescue. The cry of distress is the summons to relief. The law does not ignore those reactions in tracing conduct to its consequences. It recognizes them as normal. The wrong yhat imperils life is a wrong to the imperiled victim : it is a wrong also to the rescuer....the risk of rescue if only it is not wanton, is born of the occasion. The emergency begets the man. The wrongdoer may not have foreseen the coming of a deliverer. He is aaccountable as if he had."

3. Baker v. T.E. Hopkins & Son
@novus actus interveniens

Комментарии

Информация по комментариям в разработке