Logo video2dn
  • Сохранить видео с ютуба
  • Категории
    • Музыка
    • Кино и Анимация
    • Автомобили
    • Животные
    • Спорт
    • Путешествия
    • Игры
    • Люди и Блоги
    • Юмор
    • Развлечения
    • Новости и Политика
    • Howto и Стиль
    • Diy своими руками
    • Образование
    • Наука и Технологии
    • Некоммерческие Организации
  • О сайте

Скачать или смотреть Resolving SQL Stored Procedure Issues with Optional Parameters for Pharmacy Column

  • vlogize
  • 2025-05-27
  • 0
Resolving SQL Stored Procedure Issues with Optional Parameters for Pharmacy Column
Two Optional parameters on one column in stored proceduresqlsql servert sql
  • ok logo

Скачать Resolving SQL Stored Procedure Issues with Optional Parameters for Pharmacy Column бесплатно в качестве 4к (2к / 1080p)

У нас вы можете скачать бесплатно Resolving SQL Stored Procedure Issues with Optional Parameters for Pharmacy Column или посмотреть видео с ютуба в максимальном доступном качестве.

Для скачивания выберите вариант из формы ниже:

  • Информация по загрузке:

Cкачать музыку Resolving SQL Stored Procedure Issues with Optional Parameters for Pharmacy Column бесплатно в формате MP3:

Если иконки загрузки не отобразились, ПОЖАЛУЙСТА, НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если у вас возникли трудности с загрузкой, пожалуйста, свяжитесь с нами по контактам, указанным в нижней части страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса video2dn.com

Описание к видео Resolving SQL Stored Procedure Issues with Optional Parameters for Pharmacy Column

Learn how to effectively manage `optional parameters` for a pharmacy column in your SQL stored procedures while ensuring expected behavior with clear examples.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/68751782/ asked by the user 'Saisql' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/16326777/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/68756834/ provided by the user 'Gordon Linoff' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1144035/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Two Optional parameters on one column in stored procedure

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the Problem: Handling Optional Parameters in SQL

In the world of SQL Server, creating stored procedures that effectively filter results based on parameters can sometimes become a tricky endeavor—especially when those parameters are optional. One common issue arises when dealing with multiple optional parameters for a single column in a table.

In this guide, we will tackle a specific scenario involving a stored procedure that handles electronic prescriptions, particularly focusing on the pharmacy column. The challenge here is that the stored procedure is not returning the expected results when only one of two optional parameters is provided.

The Challenge

Consider you have a table named eRx that contains a pharmacy column. You've set up your parameters as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

These two parameters are meant to filter records where the pharmacy matches either of these values. However, when you only pass one parameter, you notice that the procedure returns all records instead of filtering correctly. For instance, if you set @ pharmacy = 'CVS', the result unexpectedly includes all rows in the table.

Solution Breakdown: Adjusting the WHERE Clause

To achieve the desired behavior—where all rows are only returned when both parameters are NULL, and specific records are returned otherwise—you will need to modify the logic in your WHERE clause.

Proposed Solution

You can rework your WHERE condition to explicitly check for both parameters being NULL. The proposed SQL logic is as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Explanation of the Logic

LIKE Conditions:

The first two conditions check if the pharmacy name matches either of the provided parameters, allowing for partial matches using LIKE.

NULL Check:

The last part, (@ Pharmacy IS NULL AND @ Pharmacy1 IS NULL), ensures that you only retrieve all records when both parameters are NULL. This prevents all rows from being returned in case only one of the parameters is specified.

Why This Works

In SQL, if you concatenate a NULL value with another string using the + operator, the result is NULL. This means that when either of your @ Pharmacy or @ Pharmacy1 parameters is NULL, the first two conditions resolve to NULL, which is treated as FALSE, effectively filtering those out.

Conclusion

With these adjustments to your SQL logic, your stored procedure should now behave as intended. You will only retrieve all records when neither parameter is specified, and it will filter correctly based on the parameters you decide to pass. Understanding how to effectively manage optional parameters can help streamline your SQL queries and improve the functionality of your stored procedures.

By clearly structuring your WHERE clause, you can avoid confusion and ensure accurate results in your database operations. Happy querying!

Комментарии

Информация по комментариям в разработке

Похожие видео

  • О нас
  • Контакты
  • Отказ от ответственности - Disclaimer
  • Условия использования сайта - TOS
  • Политика конфиденциальности

video2dn Copyright © 2023 - 2025

Контакты для правообладателей [email protected]