Скачать или смотреть Understanding constexpr and consteval in C+ + : Why Compile-Time Execution Isn't Guaranteed

Explore the intricacies of C+ + 's `constexpr` and `consteval`. Understand why `constexpr` isn’t strictly compile-time and the importance of `consteval`.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/71686081/ asked by the user 'user904963' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/904963/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/71686131/ provided by the user 'user17732522' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/17732522/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Why isn't constexpr guaranteed to run during compilation?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding constexpr and consteval in C+ + : Why Compile-Time Execution Isn't Guaranteed

C+ + developers often encounter the terms constexpr and consteval, but there's a common confusion regarding what each means and how they influence code execution, especially concerning compile-time evaluations. A frequent question that surfaces is: Why isn't constexpr guaranteed to run during compilation? This guide aims to demystify this topic and shed light on the distinctions between constexpr and consteval, including the rationale behind introducing consteval instead of simply modifying constexpr.

What is constexpr?

constexpr, short for "constant expression", is a keyword in C+ + that indicates that the value of a variable can be determined at compile time. It can be applied to both variables and functions, but its behavior differs based on where it is used.

Variables: When you declare a variable as constexpr, you are telling the compiler that the variable's value is constant and can be computed at compile time.

Functions: When applied to a function, constexpr suggests that the function can be evaluated at compile time, but does not strictly enforce that it must be. This flexibility allows the function to be valid at both compile-time and runtime.

Why Isn’t constexpr Guarantees Compile-Time Execution?

The reason constexpr does not guarantee compile-time execution for functions is to retain functionality for most cases. The intent of constexpr allows developers to utilize the same function signature in both contexts.

Key points:

You often want functions to be usable outside constant expressions.

Imposing a strict compile-time evaluation would limit the usability of many functions.

Introducing consteval

To address scenarios where the requirement for compile-time evaluation is stringent, C+ + provides the consteval keyword. This guarantees that a function can only be evaluated at compile time. If you try to call a consteval function at runtime, it will result in a compilation error.

Characteristics of consteval

Enforcement of Compile-Time Execution: The primary purpose of consteval is to enforce that functions are treated as constant expressions.

Limited Use Cases: While consteval provides this guarantee, the need for such strictness is not common in most programming scenarios, which is one reason this feature was introduced alongside constexpr rather than replacing it.

Conclusion

In summary, constexpr is designed to provide flexibility in C+ + by not enforcing a strict compile-time evaluation for functions, allowing developers greater versatility in function usage. In contrast, consteval offers strict guarantees when compile-time evaluation is a necessity. Understanding the distinction between these two keywords can significantly enhance your ability to write efficient and maintainable C+ + code.

By grasping these concepts, you can better implement functionality in your programs, ensuring that you effectively leverage the capabilities of C+ + while avoiding potential pitfalls.