Discover whether PostgreSQL supports `direct reads` like Oracle and learn about its data caching approach in this insightful guide.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63941075/ asked by the user 'nmakb' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/3904501/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63941407/ provided by the user 'Laurenz Albe' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/6464308/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Are direct reads possible in postgresql
Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Direct Reads in PostgreSQL
In the world of databases, the ability to read data efficiently is crucial for optimal performance. Users often draw comparisons between different database management systems to understand their features better. One such comparison is between Oracle and PostgreSQL, particularly when it comes to the concept of direct reads. A question arises: "Are direct reads possible in PostgreSQL?" In this post, we'll explore this topic in detail to clarify the distinctions and functions of PostgreSQL's caching system.
What are Direct Reads?
In Oracle, direct reads allow a session to read data directly from a table into its session memory, bypassing the buffer cache. This approach can enhance performance in scenarios where data needs to be accessed rapidly without the latency introduced by caching mechanisms. But what about PostgreSQL? Let's delve deeper.
Distinguishing Between Caches in PostgreSQL
Before answering the central question, it's essential to understand the types of caches involved in PostgreSQL:
Kernel Cache vs. Database Shared Memory Cache
Kernel Cache:
This cache is managed by the operating system. It caches files to improve both read and write operations.
When data is requested, the system checks this cache first before going to disk.
Database Shared Memory Cache (Shared Buffers):
This is PostgreSQL's own caching mechanism, where the database caches table and index blocks.
The intent here is to improve data read efficiency by minimizing direct disk access.
The Role of Shared Buffers in PostgreSQL
Every database system, including PostgreSQL, utilizes a shared memory cache. Here’s why this is crucial:
Performance: Without caching, the overall performance of database operations would be drastically hindered.
Efficient Resource Management: Shared buffers allow PostgreSQL to manage memory better, thereby speeding up data retrieval processes.
The Answer: Are Direct Reads Possible?
At this point, you might be wondering, "Can I bypass these caches in PostgreSQL and perform direct I/O?" The short answer is no. PostgreSQL does not currently support direct I/O, meaning:
All read and write requests still interact with the shared memory cache.
There are no built-in mechanisms to avoid the kernel cache, unlike what Oracle offers with direct reads.
The Future of Direct I/O in PostgreSQL
While it is recognized that buffered I/O has its complications, particularly regarding data consistency and potential failure scenarios during sync requests, there are discussions within the PostgreSQL community about the future of direct I/O capability. Here are a few points to consider:
Recognition of Issues: Problems with buffered I/O include scenarios where a write may succeed, but subsequent sync requests could fail, leading to inconsistencies.
Looking Ahead: Some influential members of the PostgreSQL community speculate that transitioning to direct I/O could become desirable, but such a change would not be simple and could take time.
Conclusion
While PostgreSQL does not currently support direct reads in the same manner as Oracle, understanding its caching mechanisms and their implications on database performance is essential for optimally managing your data operations. PostgreSQL's reliance on shared buffers guarantees efficiency, even if it does not provide the flexibility that direct reads offer.
As PostgreSQL continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see how and if the features surrounding data access methods, including direct I/O, will change. For now, developers and database administrators must work within the existing framework to leverage PostgreSQL's strengths.
Stay tuned for more updates on database technologies and best practices!
Информация по комментариям в разработке