Скачать или смотреть Solving the Deferred Retrofit Request Response Problem in Kotlin Coroutines

Learn how to fix the common issue of returning `Deferred` from a `suspend` function in Retrofit with Kotlin Coroutines.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/71127175/ asked by the user 'james04' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5371749/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/71127504/ provided by the user 'Joffrey' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1540818/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Deferred retrofit request response problem

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the Problem: Deferred Retrofit Request Response Issue

As a developer utilizing Retrofit in Kotlin, you may encounter issues when trying to make asynchronous API requests using coroutines. One such issue arises when you attempt to use a suspend function alongside a Deferred return type. This combination often leads to RuntimeException related to the instantiation of types and is commonly accompanied by error messages from Gson indicating difficulties in parsing the response.

Let’s break down this problem to understand why it happens and how to resolve it effectively.

The Cause of the Issue

The primary cause of this problem lies in the incorrect use of the Deferred type with suspend functions in Retrofit. Here’s a quick look at the code you might be using:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In a coroutine context, the suspend keyword allows functions to be called in a non-blocking manner, returning a result when it is ready. However, using Deferred as the return type creates unnecessary complexity and confusion. The errors you see typically arise because of how Retrofit and Gson handle conversion and instantiation for these types, leading to UnsupportedOperationException errors.

The Solution: Adjusting Function Return Type

To resolve the issue, you need to change the return type of your function. The suspend functions are designed to be called directly like regular functions, not wrapped in Deferred. Here’s how you can do it correctly:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Key Changes Explained

Remove Deferred: By changing the return type from Deferred<ResponseBody> to simply ResponseBody, you allow the coroutine to handle the asynchronous nature of the request on its own.

Utilize Coroutine Builders: When you call this function within a coroutine scope, you can use coroutine builders like async or launch without needing to wrap the return type.

Here’s an example of how you can call this function within a coroutine scope:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Benefits of This Approach

Simplification: You avoid complications related to Deferred, which doesn't lend itself well to suspend functions.

Improved Readability: The code becomes easier to follow and maintain, as the intent of asynchronous behavior is clearer.

Conclusion

By understanding the underlying problem with returning Deferred from suspend functions and adjusting your method definitions accordingly, you can successfully implement asynchronous Retrofit requests with Kotlin coroutines. Always remember that suspend functions should return regular types and let coroutine builders manage the asynchrony efficiently.

With these modifications, you’ll ensure smoother API integration and a more streamlined coding experience. Happy coding!