Left Realist Theories of Crime and Deviance - Lea & Young | A Level Sociology

The contribution of Lea & Young to theories of crime and deviance is explored in this video.

#aqasociology #AQAALevelSociology #ALevelSociology #CrimeAndDeviance

VIDEO TIMESTAMPS
00:00 - Introduction to left realist theories of crime and deviance.
00:33 - Response to right realist policies dominating criminal justice.
01:06 - Crime as a combination of multiple factors.
01:39 - Factors: relative deprivation, subcultural responses, and marginalization.
02:13 - Relative deprivation and economic disparity.
02:46 - Subcultures as responses to societal pressures.
03:18 - Coping mechanisms of subcultures among the working class.
03:49 - Marginalization and frustration.
04:24 - Powerful institutions and marginalization.
04:54 - Evaluation of Lee and Young's work.
05:28 - Conclusion, considering unreported crimes and data manipulation.

VIDEO SUMMARY
This tutorial video on left realist theories of crime and deviance examines the work of Lee and Young. Left realism emerged as a response to rising crime rates, aiming to provide realistic solutions. Lee and Young identified multiple factors contributing to crime, including relative deprivation, subcultural responses, and marginalization. They highlighted how relative deprivation can lead to criminal behavior, even among the middle classes. Subcultures were seen as a way to alleviate deprivation and gain status or material benefits. Marginalization, resulting from minimal representation and blocked opportunities, could lead to violence and anti-social behavior as a form of protest. Lee and Young's approach built on the work of previous theorists and influenced criminal justice policies. However, critics argue that their work lacks empirical evidence, citing the decline in recorded crime during the era of global capitalism. Overall, the video emphasizes the complexity of crime and the importance of addressing its underlying causes.

KEY TERMS: left realist theories, crime, deviance, structural inequality, social control, labeling, relative deprivation, subcultures, marginalization, criminal behavior, coping mechanisms.