Скачать или смотреть Which Implementation of a Factorial Function is Generally Faster in Java?

Discover the optimal approach for implementing a factorial function in Java. Learn which methods yield better performance and why it matters!
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/62307487/ asked by the user 'anon' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13721656/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/62309691/ provided by the user 'ruakh' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/978917/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Which implementation of a factorial function is generally faster in Java?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Which Implementation of a Factorial Function is Generally Faster in Java?

Factorial functions are a fundamental concept in programming and mathematics, used often in statistics, combinatorics, and even algorithms. However, when implementing a factorial function in Java, many programmers find themselves pondering over the best approach to optimize performance. In this guide, we will explore two popular implementations of the factorial function, identify which is generally faster, and discuss why that might be the case.

The Problem at Hand

Consider the two implementations below:

Method 1: Low-to-High Multiplication

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Method 2: High-to-Low Multiplication

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Both methods correctly compute the factorial of n, but the question arises: Which of these two implementations is faster? Additionally, we will consider how the choice of data types (e.g., long vs. BigInteger) influences performance.

Exploring the Solutions

Performance Testing

To answer the performance question, a performance test was conducted using n = 100,000. Results from multiple runs indicated consistent findings:

The low-to-high method was generally faster than the high-to-low method.

Both methods were significantly outperformed by an alternative approach that multiplied pairs of adjacent numbers before combining the results.

Why the Low-to-High Method Performs Better

Multiplication Costs:

Multiplying larger numbers is computationally more expensive. The low-to-high method maintains smaller intermediate products, which keeps most multiplications cheaper.

In contrast, the high-to-low method quickly escalates the size of the product, leading to more costly operations.

Cost Tracking:

By measuring the "cost" of multiplication based on the bit length of the result, it was discovered that the low-to-high method had a total cost of approximately 72 billion bits, while the high-to-low method cost around 79 billion bits.

The method of multiplying pairs of adjacent numbers showed a dramatically lower cost of just 25 million bits, highlighting its efficiency.

Sample Results

Here's an example output from the testing, demonstrating runtime differences:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

These results reveal that not only is the low-to-high method faster than the high-to-low method, but the optimal strategy of pairing numbers together is by far the best approach.

Other Considerations

Small Values of n: For smaller inputs (like 1000 or 10,000), the performance trend remains, though differences may exhibit more noise. Larger n values accentuate the performance advantages of the better algorithm more clearly.

Data Type Choice: The impact of using long or int instead of BigInteger also warrants analysis, especially considering overflow behavior, but the core findings about multiplication cost remain relevant.

Conclusion

When implementing a factorial function in Java, choosing the right approach can significantly impact performance. Our analysis shows that the low-to-high multiplication method is generally faster than the high-to-low method, thanks to its efficient handling of multiplication costs. Furthermore, engaging in techniques like splitting numbers into pairs can lead to even greater optimizations.

Understanding these nuances can immensely help optimize code performance, especially in applications involving large computations. Happy coding!