Скачать или смотреть Understanding urandom_range(): Are Random Numbers Cyclical?

A deep dive into the functionality of `urandom_range()` in SystemVerilog and its implications for transaction dropping in verification testing.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/72255723/ asked by the user 'Lian' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/19106856/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/72257026/ provided by the user 'dave_59' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2755607/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Whether the random numbers generated by $urandom_range() are 'cyclical random'?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding urandom_range(): Are Random Numbers Cyclical?

In the world of SystemVerilog and digital verification, randomness plays a crucial role. The question about whether the numbers generated by the $urandom_range() function are 'cyclical random' is insightful but often misunderstood. Today, we will explore the workings of $urandom_range(), its implications in terms of transaction dropping, and clarify some common misconceptions.

The Problem at Hand

When developing a verification environment, a common scenario is to drop transactions randomly to simulate packet loss. For instance, the statement drop = ($urandom_range(0,99) == 0) is designed to drop 1 out of every 100 transactions—effectively offering a 1% chance for each transaction to be lost. However, the underlying question arises: Are these random outputs cyclical?

What is $urandom_range()?

Definition and Purpose

$urandom_range(min, max) is a built-in SystemVerilog function used to generate random numbers within a specified range. Here, it is typically utilized in contexts like simulation and testing to introduce variability.

Key Characteristics

Probabilistic Output: The output is determined by a pseudo-random number generator, which means the numbers will not repeat in a predictable manner, but the distribution remains uniform.

Non-Cyclical Generation: The results generated by $urandom_range() are not cyclical; every execution of the function is intended to provide a variety of outputs based on the underlying seed used by the random number generator.

Are the Outputs Cyclical Random?

According to the definition of $urandom_range(), one should note the following:

Non-Cyclical Nature: The function itself is not cyclical. This means that while it can repeat values across multiple runs, the nature of its randomness does not follow a set pattern or cycle—hence, it's more accurately described as a non-cyclical random number generator.

Implementation Caveat: If you're observing patterns or cycles in the randomness, it could arise from either misconfigurations in the random generator's seeding or incorrect implementation of your code logic, rather than the concatenated range function itself.

Example Implementation Explained

To harness the capability of $urandom_range() effectively, let's dissect the code snippet provided in the initial question.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Breakdown:

Class Declaration: Driver_cbs_drop inherits from a base class, Driver_cbs, specializing it for transaction drops.

Random Decision Making: In pre_tx(), the drop variable is assigned a value based on a probabilistic outcome where 1 out of every 100 transactions is dropped.

Utilization in Driver: The Driver class collates these callbacks allowing various actions before and after each transaction is processed.

Conclusion

To summarize, $urandom_range() functions as a reliable means of introducing randomness into your testing environment, but it does not yield cyclical random outputs. If there are observable patterns, it's crucial to review the seeding or code implementations to ensure randomness is upheld. By understanding these elements, you can better simulate real-world conditions in your testing scenarios and maintain a robust verification environment.

With this knowledge, you can enhance your SystemVerilog testing protocols, ensuring a more effective and accurate simulation of hardware behavior.