Скачать или смотреть BREAKING: EXPLOSIVE Clash Over Trump’s Move to Fire Fed Governor — Supreme Court Showdown Looms

PRESIDENTIAL POWER CLASH: Donald Trump moved to oust Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook over an unproven mortgage fraud allegation — despite Supreme Court guidance suggesting presidents lack unilateral authority to remove Fed officials. Cook denies wrongdoing, has filed suit, and the battle is now headed for the courts.
What the evidence shows:

Trump’s defiance: openly testing whether the Court will enforce its own rulings

“Cause” standard manipulation: no proof of misconduct, just partisan accusations

Fed independence under threat: political control could hit interest rates, jobs, and inflation

Conservative backlash: even Eric Erickson warns Trump is undermining due process

LEGAL RED LINE: Federal Reserve law permits removal only “for cause,” requiring actual proof of misconduct — not tweets, rumors, or political retaliation. Legal scholars note that firing Cook based on an unverified charge breaches institutional safeguards designed to insulate monetary policy from partisan control.

CONSTITUTIONAL STAKES: By daring the Supreme Court to stop him, Trump is challenging the separation of powers itself. If the Court fails to act, presidents could purge independent officials at will, destabilizing markets and eroding democratic checks.

This showdown isn’t just about the Fed — it’s about whether the executive branch can override judicial limits with raw power. The case highlights how constitutional governance depends on courts holding the line against political interference.

SUBSCRIBE for sharp analysis of executive overreach and constitutional balance
COMMENT: Should the Supreme Court step in — or let Trump push the limits?
#SeparationOfPowers #FederalReserve #ExecutiveOverreach #SupremeCourt #Politics2025 #RuleOfLaw #ConstitutionalCrisis