Скачать или смотреть “I Am Not Biased” Judge Responds to Bond ChallengeDescription

In this courtroom hearing in Wisconsin, a defendant argues that the judge may be biased after previously signing a search warrant in his case.
The court firmly responds:
“I am impartial. You are innocent unless the State proves you guilty.”
Facing multiple felony charges, including Class E felonies carrying up to 15 years each, the defendant requests a bond reduction from $10,000 cash. He emphasizes:
• 25 years without court involvement
• Long-term residency
• Home ownership
• Disability status
• Presumption of innocence
The judge explains the legal standards for bond:
• Likelihood of appearance
• Severity of potential penalties
• Alleged facts supporting probable cause
• Public safety considerations
• Constitutional right to counsel
Because the defendant has been in custody for over a month without appointed counsel, the court ultimately reduces bond to $2,500 cash while maintaining conditions of release.
This case highlights:
• Judicial impartiality standards
• Bond-setting factors
• Presumption of innocence
• Public defender appointment delays
• Constitutional protections in pretrial custody
Justice requires balance — protecting rights while protecting the public.


Chapters
0:00 – Case Called & Appearances
3:15 – Defendant Raises Bias Concern
6:40 – Judge Responds on Impartiality
11:10 – Bond Factors Explained
16:45 – Prosecutor Argument
20:30 – Discussion of Property & Equity
24:15 – Bond Reduced to $2,500
27:00 – Case Reset & Closing


This video is shared for educational and informational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. The content is presented to explain courtroom procedures and constitutional protections within the justice system.


#BondHearing #PresumptionOfInnocence #JudicialImpartiality #CriminalCourt #WisconsinCourt #JuriScope