Here's why we should keep it!

In this video, we'll be reviewing the evidence for and against the inclusion of the passage from Matthew 18:11: For the Son of Man has come to save that which was lost. Should we retain it like the Byzantine Text and the Textus Receptus do? Or should we remove it like the Critical Text does. Join me as we take a look at the details.

This video is a condensed and edited from of the 1.5 hour livestream that happened on June 19th, 2024.

#textualcriticism #byzantinetext


~~~ CONTENTS ~~~

0:00 Introduction
0:50 Lets not dismiss the issue at hand
1:56 English Bibles and Matthew 18:11
6:40 The NET Bible notes
10:00 The parellel passage in Luke 19
11:47 Which Greek texts have and dont have the passage
12:41 Metzgers Commentary of the Greek New Testament
15:10 Variations within Matthew 18:11
16:30 The earliest manuscript which contains the passage
17:10 Codex L and the marginal note
19:29 Codex K another 9th century manuscript
20:22 A Latin Greek interlinear manuscript
22:55 to seek and to save
23:53 Squashing Metzgers argument
25:13 Why these kinds of arguments are poor
27:05 Manuscripts that dont contain matthew 18:11
31:15 Family 1 and Family 13
32:15 Conclusion