Скачать или смотреть BREAKING: Venezuela Slashes U.S. Oil — Calculated Strike at Heart of Imperial Dominance | John M.

🚨 BREAKING: Professor John M. analyzes Venezuela's calculated strike at imperial dominance as oil exports to U.S. slashed by 60%+ from 400,000 to 150,000 barrels daily, ending century-old backyard control assumptions.

In this explosive analysis, discover:

How Venezuela cut U.S. oil by 60%+ - "calculated blow to core assumption of extraction and intervention"
Why "3+ years of quiet diversification" with China/Russia coordination preceded the strike
How "sanctions trap exploited" - Venezuela endured pain, found alternatives, emerged stronger
Why Gulf Coast refineries face supply crisis - "heavy crude designed refineries can't switch easily"
How "backyard era ending" - not because America withdrew but conditions changed fundamentally

📊 Imperial DOMINANCE Shattered:

Oil weapon activated: 400K→150K barrels daily cuts strike heart of hemispheric control
Strategic planning: 3+ year quiet diversification with Chinese/Russian energy partnerships
Sanctions backfire: Maximum pressure created necessity for alternative relationships strengthening independence
Economic pragmatism: Yuan/rupee payments bypass dollar system eliminating American intermediation
Regional transformation: Mexico energy sovereignty, Brazil Chinese partnerships accelerating

Professor John M. reveals power shift: "This is not temporary disruption but fundamental recalibration of power. Caracas not begging for sanctions relief; moving forward without American approval. For more than century United States viewed Latin America as backyard. That period ending because conditions that made dominance possible have changed."

🔗 Related Topics: Venezuela oil cuts, imperial dominance, sanctions backfire, energy sovereignty, hemispheric control, Mearsheimer analysis

Disclaimer: This dramatized story is inspired by real events and public figures. All dialogue and incidents are fictionalized for commentary and educational purposes. This is not intended to defame but to explore themes of intelligence oversight, institutional accountability, and government transparency.