Скачать или смотреть Understanding List Reversal Profiling in Python vs. Erlang

A deep dive into the performance differences of list reversal between Python and Erlang, including profiling techniques and optimizations.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63456726/ asked by the user 'Hypro999' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/8099133/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63456830/ provided by the user 'juanpa.arrivillaga' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5014455/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Issues when profiling list reversal in Python vs Erlang

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding List Reversal Profiling in Python vs. Erlang

When you're building applications or conducting benchmarks, understanding the performance differences between programming languages is vital. One common task—reversing a list—can offer insight into how Python and Erlang handle list operations. In this guide, we'll dive into profiling the list reversal in both languages and address some common pitfalls in testing methodologies.

The Problem at Hand

In a recent experiment, the performance of Erlang's built-in function (lists:reverse) was profiled against various sizes of lists, with results indicating a consistent linear correlation between input size and execution time. However, repeating the same process in Python produced dramatically faster results, sparking questions about the differences in implementation and profiling techniques.

The Experiment

Erlang: You profiled the list reversal for sizes including 1,000,000 and 10,000,000.

Python: You constructed similar tests using list comprehensions and measured execution time using a custom profiling function.

The results were surprising—Python's reversal methods returned execution times in microseconds, making it incredibly efficient compared to Erlang. However, upon further investigation, it became clear that the profiling method employed in Python had a critical flaw.

Profiling Techniques

1. Incorrect Profiling Implementation

The original profiling function you wrote in Python utilized variable positional arguments but did not unpack them correctly. This meant that when calling the function to reverse the list, it was actually only ever processing a single tuple as an argument rather than the list itself.

Here's the Fix:

Modify the profile function to properly unpack the arguments when calling the function. Update your code as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

2. Understanding List Reversal in Python

In Python, there are primarily two ways to reverse a list:

Using slicing: m[::-1] creates a new list that is a reversed version of m.

Using the reversed() function: This creates an iterator that will iterate over the list in reverse order but does not immediately create a reversed list.

Performance Implications

m[::-1]: This operation runs in linear time, requiring that a new list be created.

reversed(m): This function is efficient because it yields values on demand rather than generating a full reversed list immediately.

It's essential to understand that Python is using optimized memory management at play, which can lead to extremely fast reversal times.

Key Questions Answered

Is My Profiling Technique Flawed?

Yes, the original profiling technique you used did not correctly assess the performance since the function was not receiving its expected arguments. This could lead to misleading performance metrics. Always ensure your profiling function unpacks arguments correctly.

What Is the Difference in Implementation of Lists and Their Reversal in Erlang vs Python?

The main differences lie in how lists are represented and handled:

Erlang: Lists are linked lists where the reversal is typically managed using tail recursion or optimized underlying C implementations in BIFs. Performance tends to scale linearly with input size.

Python: Lists are dynamic arrays, allowing efficient memory access patterns that facilitate rapid reversal when optimized.

Conclusion

Profiling and comparing performance across different programming languages can be tricky, especially when you encounter differences in argument handling. By ensuring that you properly structure your testing methods and understanding language-specific implementations, you can gain meaningful insights into performance charac