The Great Debate | Why Democracy Tomorrow Means Climate Action Today

The moderator, Brian Kithinji, began the session by introducing the topic and outlining the debate's structure. Over the past five years, there has been a significant increase in droughts and cyclones, occurrences not seen in the last 30 years. This alarming trend has shifted the focus towards climate finance. Despite Africa contributing only 4% to the global carbon emissions, it receives a mere 2% of global climate finance. Kithinji posed a critical question: Do we need to revolutionize our democratic system to ensure climate change initiatives become grassroots-driven, or should we maintain our current system and focus solely on climate action? The debate centered around three main questions:

-What can we do to prevent environmental invaders?
-How do we ensure adequate climate finance?
-How do we make climate action community-driven?

The debate brought forth a rich discussion on the intricate relationship between democratic governance and effective climate action. The debaters provided varied perspectives, offering insights into both the opportunities and challenges presented by this relationship.

Brian Kithinji – Moderator

Proposers
Moses Wangwa- Prime minister
Esther Mbone (The Oslo Center) - Deputy prime Minister
Brian Ngugi, (Wangari Maathai Institute for Peace and Environmental Studies) – Whip

Opposers
Miriam Akinyi - Opposition leader
Victor Kwabe - Deputy Opposition Leader
Lenox Onyango - Opposition Whip

Judges
Dalistani Ngulube – Youth Arise, Zambia
Emmanuel Singa- SOS Civisme, Central Africa Republic
Miriam Nafula– The Youth Café

Analysis

Challenges:
Disconnect between democracy and Climate Action: A major challenge discussed was disconnect between democratic governance and effective climate action, with arguments on how democracy can both support and hinder urgent decisions.
Need for Local Expertise and Public Involvement: The debate highlighted the necessity of involving local expertise and the public in designing and implementing climate initiatives.
Economic and Political Realities: The discussion reflected the complex interplay between economic constraints, political realities, and effective climate action, particularly in the African
context.
Transparency and Accountability: There is a need for transparent and accountable governance, with differing views on whether democracy or technocracy is better suited to deliver these values.
Short-Term Focus of Democracies: opposers highlighted that democracies often focus on short-term solutions, which may not be effective for long-term climate strategies.

Recommendations:
Encourage cohesive global and local partnerships to address climate change comprehensively.
Embrace technological advancements, such as electric vehicles and solar energy, to reduce carbon emissions.
Develop and implement laws and policies that incentivize companies to reduce their carbon footprint.
Support grassroots fundraising and initiatives to ensure local communities are actively involved in climate action.
Renew and strengthen democratic institutions to ensure they can effectively support and implement climate action.
Develop inclusive policies that consider the needs and contributions of the most vulnerable populations, including youth.

To learn more about our work, visit www.theyouthcafe.com or email us at [email protected]