Скачать или смотреть Picking the Best Compression Algorithm for Low-Memory Devices

Discover how to effectively choose a compression algorithm for low-memory devices, allowing file extraction without consuming entire memory.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/70381764/ asked by the user 'Brian McBrayer' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2934445/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/70383404/ provided by the user 'Mark Adler' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1180620/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Picking compression algorithm for low-memory device - what works without being entirely in memory?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Compression Algorithms for Low-Memory Devices

When developing applications for low-memory devices, choosing the right compression algorithm is crucial. In particular, when dealing with compressed archive formats like tar, it's essential to be able to read the file list and extract random files without loading the entire archive into memory. This post will guide you through the considerations to help you select the most suitable compression method for your needs.

The Challenge: Working on Low-Memory Devices

Low-memory devices, such as embedded systems or older hardware, often have strict limitations on RAM. This necessitates a careful approach when implementing features that involve file compression and extraction. Users frequently need to know:

Can I read the list of files in a compressed archive?

Can I extract specific files without decompressing everything in memory?

Common Compression Formats and Their Streaming Capabilities

Most commonly-used compression formats allow for some degree of streaming, meaning you can process the data sequentially rather than all at once. Below, we explore two popular formats—bzip2 and gzip—and their behavior in low-memory situations.

1. Bzip2 Tarballs

Streaming Capability: Bzip2 does support streaming but has a relatively higher memory requirement compared to other formats.

Memory Requirement: Approximately 4MB of memory is needed for history information while decompressing.

Although bzip2 can be streamed, consider whether the memory overhead is suitable for your specific low-memory device. If your device has at least 4MB available, bzip2 will work for your requirements.

2. Gzip Tarballs

Streaming Capability: Gzip (often referred to as zlib) also supports streaming and is generally more versatile for low-memory applications.

Memory Requirement: The required memory footprint is significantly lower, at around 32KB.

Given its minor memory requirements, gzip is a solid choice if you want to prioritize efficiency alongside the ability to stream data effectively.

Alternative Compression Formats

While bzip2 and gzip are two of the most commonly used formats, there are several other options worth considering:

LZ4: Great for speed with moderate compression efficiency. It has a low memory footprint, making it suitable for low-memory environments.

Zstandard (Zstd): Offers a good balance between compression ratio and speed, with memory usage ranging based on the compression level chosen.

LZMA: High compression ratios but typically requires more memory compared to gzip and bzip2, making it less ideal for very constrained environments.

Conclusion: Choosing the Right Compression Format

In summary, if you’re working within a low-memory environment and need to read lists of files or extract specific files from compressed tarballs, both bzip2 and gzip are viable solutions. Your final decision should weigh the memory requirements against your application’s specific constraints.

Final Recommendations:

If your device has at least 4MB of available memory, consider bzip2 for better compression ratios.

If minimizing memory usage is crucial (especially below 4MB), then gzip or even alternatives like LZ4 or Zstandard should be evaluated.

By understanding the characteristics of each format, developers can make informed decisions that enhance application performance on low-memory devices while still providing essential functionality.