Logo video2dn
  • Сохранить видео с ютуба
  • Категории
    • Музыка
    • Кино и Анимация
    • Автомобили
    • Животные
    • Спорт
    • Путешествия
    • Игры
    • Люди и Блоги
    • Юмор
    • Развлечения
    • Новости и Политика
    • Howto и Стиль
    • Diy своими руками
    • Образование
    • Наука и Технологии
    • Некоммерческие Организации
  • О сайте

Скачать или смотреть Optimizing LINQ Queries: OrderBy vs Select Performance in C#

  • vlogize
  • 2025-02-25
  • 7
Optimizing LINQ Queries: OrderBy vs Select Performance in C#
.netOrderBy then Select vs Select then OrderBy performancec#linqperformance
  • ok logo

Скачать Optimizing LINQ Queries: OrderBy vs Select Performance in C# бесплатно в качестве 4к (2к / 1080p)

У нас вы можете скачать бесплатно Optimizing LINQ Queries: OrderBy vs Select Performance in C# или посмотреть видео с ютуба в максимальном доступном качестве.

Для скачивания выберите вариант из формы ниже:

  • Информация по загрузке:

Cкачать музыку Optimizing LINQ Queries: OrderBy vs Select Performance in C# бесплатно в формате MP3:

Если иконки загрузки не отобразились, ПОЖАЛУЙСТА, НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если у вас возникли трудности с загрузкой, пожалуйста, свяжитесь с нами по контактам, указанным в нижней части страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса video2dn.com

Описание к видео Optimizing LINQ Queries: OrderBy vs Select Performance in C#

Discover the performance implications of using `OrderBy` before `Select` or vice versa in LINQ queries in C#. Learn the best practices to optimize your code.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/77632640/ asked by the user 'Alex Arsiriy' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/15693823/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/77632818/ provided by the user 'Dmitry Bychenko' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2319407/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: OrderBy then Select vs Select then OrderBy performance

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding LINQ Performance: OrderBy vs Select

When working with LINQ in C#, developers often face the dilemma of which method to use first: OrderBy or Select. This question arises from the need for efficient code, particularly when dealing with performance and memory usage. In this guide, we will explore these two options in-depth and understand their performance implications.

The Dilemma: OrderBy then Select vs Select then OrderBy

Let’s consider the problem: You have an array of user objects, and you want to extract user names while sorting them. The two possible LINQ options are:

Option 1: OrderBy first, then Select.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Option 2: Select first, then OrderBy.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

These two approaches can lead to significantly different performance outcomes. Let's dive deeper into the solution and find out which approach is optimal.

Performance Insights

Understanding the Operations

OrderBy: When you perform an OrderBy, the entire collection must be considered in memory in order to provide a sorted list. This behavior can be resource-intensive, especially for large collections since it sorts the data based on the specified key.

Select: On the other hand, Select creates a new sequence of the specified properties. When invoking Select before OrderBy, you're reducing the amount of data that needs to be sorted since you're only working with the relevant fields (like Name in this case).

Comparing the Two Options

Memory Consumption: Performing Select first can lead to lower memory consumption because the system only holds onto the necessary data (the user names), instead of the entire user object.

Speed: Skipping the sorting step on larger datasets can significantly increase performance since you’re handling less data in memory at any given moment.

Alternative Approach: Use MinBy

If you are using .NET 5 or above, an even more optimal solution is the MinBy method. This method operates in linear time complexity O(n), which is more efficient compared to sorting which typically has a time complexity of O(n * log(n)). If MinBy is not available in your version of .NET, you can achieve similar results using Aggregate:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This approach helps to efficiently find the minimum without needing to sort the entire collection.

Conclusion

When deciding between OrderBy and Select, remember that the order of execution can have significant implications on performance and memory consumption. Following best practices can lead to more efficient applications. In summary:

If your goal is to retrieve and sort data efficiently, consider using Select before OrderBy to optimize memory usage.

Use MinBy where possible to further enhance performance, or utilize Aggregate in older versions of .NET to achieve similar efficiency.

By making informed decisions about how to structure your LINQ queries, you can enhance the overall performance and responsiveness of your C# applications.

Комментарии

Информация по комментариям в разработке

Похожие видео

  • О нас
  • Контакты
  • Отказ от ответственности - Disclaimer
  • Условия использования сайта - TOS
  • Политика конфиденциальности

video2dn Copyright © 2023 - 2025

Контакты для правообладателей [email protected]