Congressman Jamie Raskin is raising serious alarms after the release of heavily redacted Epstein files, questioning whether the redactions are legally justified or part of a broader cover-up.
In this interview, Raskin explains why the scope of the redactions appears to go far beyond what federal law allows, which limits redactions to victim protection, ongoing investigations, or national security concerns. According to Raskin, none of those justifications adequately explain why entire documents were blacked out.
The discussion examines Donald Trump’s shifting position on the Epstein disclosure legislation, the Department of Justice’s role in delaying or obstructing implementation, and the broader implications for transparency and the rule of law.
Raskin also addresses longstanding questions surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s network, including why previous investigations failed, how plea deals shielded powerful figures, and whether the U.S. justice system operates under a double standard.
This interview isn’t about partisan theater — it’s about accountability, public trust, and whether the American people are being denied the full truth about one of the most disturbing criminal scandals in modern history.
📌 Subscribe for in-depth political analysis, congressional interviews, and fact-based breakdowns of major national stories.
#EpsteinFiles,#JamieRaskin,#EpsteinCoverUp,#BreakingNews,#PoliticalNews,#USPolitics,#Congress,#DOJ,#TrumpNews,#Accountability,#RuleOfLaw,#JusticeSystem,#GovernmentTransparency,#Oversight,#NewsAnalysis,#PoliticalCommentary,#Democracy,#FederalInvestigation,#EpsteinCase,#WashingtonDC
Информация по комментариям в разработке