Скачать или смотреть Should Different multiprocessing.Queue Objects Be Used for Different Processes?

Exploring best practices in Python's multiprocessing module: Do processes need separate queues when they don't communicate?
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63198687/ asked by the user 'Sena Yevenyo' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/11506959/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63198949/ provided by the user 'Dan D.' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/388787/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Should different multiprocessing.Queue objects be used for different processes when they do not communicate?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Should Different multiprocessing.Queue Objects Be Used for Different Processes?

In the world of Python's multiprocessing, one common question arises: Should different multiprocessing.Queue objects be used for different processes, particularly when those processes do not communicate? If you are new to multiprocessing, you might be grappling with how to set up your processes to ensure correct data handling without unnecessary complexity.

Understanding the Problem

Consider a scenario where you have multiple processes running concurrently, each of which generates output data. In a beginner's example, two processes are set up with a shared multiprocessing.Queue, which is designed to collect their outputs. Here is a simplified version of the scenario in code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this setup, both processes are putting data into the same queue, but they do not communicate with each other.

The Risks of Sharing One Queue

The main concern with sharing a single multiprocessing.Queue among multiple processes is the order of data retrieval. Since both processes are writing to the same queue simultaneously, the data put by one process can easily be mixed up with the other. This means:

Data Confusion: The first call to que.get() might return data from the second process instead of the first, leading to incorrect data assignments.

To ensure the integrity of your output, it's essential to consider alternative setups.

Suggested Solutions

Using Separate Queues:

One of the most straightforward solutions is to use separate queues for each process. By doing this, you can clearly separate the outputs of each process, ensuring that data is not mixed up, which maintains clarity in your code.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Tagging Data:

If you decide to stick to a single queue, you can tag the output as it's placed in the queue. This way, you can differentiate between the outputs when retrieving them.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

When retrieving data from the queue, you can then parse the output based on its tags:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

To summarize, when working with Python's multiprocessing, it's crucial to consider how data is being shared among processes. While it might seem convenient to share a single multiprocessing.Queue, it can lead to confusion and potentially debilitating bugs in your code.

By either using separate queues for each process or employing tagging for outputs, you can ensure that your multiprocessing code remains clean, clear, and reliable. Implementing these best practices will set a strong foundation as you explore the world of concurrent programming.