Скачать или смотреть How to Reference a C# Class with the Same Name in XML Documentation

Learn how to resolve XML documentation issues related to referencing classes with the same name in C# . This guide provides practical solutions and best practices for naming conventions.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/71832642/ asked by the user 'holly_cheng' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/634914/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/71832693/ provided by the user 'Jason Malinowski' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/972216/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: In XML documenttion, how do I reference another class that has the same name in the same namespace?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Reference a C# Class with the Same Name in XML Documentation

When working with C# projects, especially when building closely related packages, developers often encounter issues related to XML documentation. One common problem arises when two classes share the same name within the same namespace. This post discusses how to navigate this situation and effectively reference methods across different assemblies in your XML documentation.

The Problem: Conflicting Class Names

Imagine you have several packages, each containing a static class named IServiceCollectionExtensions within the Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection namespace. Your intent might be to document a method in one class that calls another method in a different class with the same name. Consider the following example:

Example Code

Assembly: Foo

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Assembly: Foo.Bar

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this scenario, if you try to reference AddFoo from the Foo assembly in the Foo.Bar project, Visual Studio will raise an issue with the message: "XML has cref attribute 'AddFoo(IServiceCollection)' that could not be resolved" (CS1574).

Proposed Solutions

While the most straightforward solution might be to avoid naming conflicts in the first place, let’s explore ways to reference these methods explicitly in XML documentation while acknowledging the challenges associated with your current naming conventions.

1. Different Class Names

One of the easiest ways to resolve this issue is by giving your extension method classes different names. Since these are extension methods, the specific class name often doesn’t impact their functionality, but it can significantly help clarity and avoid confusion down the line.

2. Using Explicit References

If you choose to stick with the same class name, you can reference methods explicitly using the cref attribute when documenting your methods. Here’s how:

Start the method name with M: to denote that you refer to a method explicitly.

Start the type name with T: to reference a type explicitly.

Using this syntax allows you to bypass some of the validation features in IDEs but gives you the flexibility to cross-reference methods across assemblies.

Example Usage

In your Foo.Bar project, you can modify your XML comments like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

By doing this, you indicate that you are directly referencing a method located in a specific namespace, clearly distinguishing it from the other IServiceCollectionExtensions class.

Conclusion

While having classes with the same name in the same namespace can lead to complications in XML documentation, implementing these strategies can help you manage these issues effectively. Remember, it's always worth considering refactoring for clarity and avoiding these conflicts where possible. By doing so, you not only improve your codebase but also enhance the developer experience for anyone using your libraries.

By understanding and utilizing the explicit referencing techniques in your XML documentation, you can clarify your code's intent without encountering validation issues in your IDE. Happy coding!