Linguistic Analysis of Johnny Depp and Amber Heard’s Case

🫂Welcome everyone!
We have recorded a detailed linguistic podcast for you to enjoy)

Here we analyzed the verbal and non-verbal speech of people involved in the judicial process as an indicator of reliability or unreliability of their speech during judicial interrogation on the basis of the Johnny Depp and Amber Heard case.
Hope you'll like it!

🌶️Our social networks
Snezha:   / coldshine12.  .
Mary: https://vk.com/dambulik1
Asya: https://vk.com/asyagu

Time-code
0:00 - Highlights of the video
0:54 - Intro
1:54 - Johnny Depp's baseline
5:40 - Johnny Depp's irony
7:54 - Is he truthful?
8:50 - Johnny Depp's non-verbal language 1
11:09 - Johnny Depp's non-verbal language 2
13:13 - Amber Heard. What do we think?
15:02 - “Dirty carpet” case
16:41 - “Bruise kit” case
18:15 - “Backless dress” case
21:24 - “ I use donate and pledge synonymously” case
25:44 - "Photoshop” case
27:18 - Amber's testimony(2016)
29:32 - Witnesses' analysis
30:35 - Romero’s testimony
31:56 - David Spiegel and AMA rule
34:15 - David Spiegel non-verbal cues
37:54 - Conclusion

Materials used:
   / @lawandcrime  
   • Alejandro Romero Funny Moments 😂😂 Joh...  

#court #johnnydepptrial #linguistics #podcast #johnnydeppisinnocent #amberheardguilty #amberheard #spiegel #alejandro #verbalcommunication #nonverbalcommunication