Скачать или смотреть Understanding the Relationship Between L-Attributed Grammars and Bottom-Up Parsing

Explore how L-attributed grammars facilitate attribute computation during bottom-up parsing and what implications this has for context-free grammars like LR(k).
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/62491256/ asked by the user 'SimpleName' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9722753/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/62500755/ provided by the user 'rici' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1566221/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: L-attributed grammar and bottom-up parsing

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the Relationship Between L-Attributed Grammars and Bottom-Up Parsing

When diving into the world of programming languages, compilers, and syntax analysis, one comes across various concepts that are crucial for understanding how these systems operate. One such concept is the idea of L-attributed grammars and their application during bottom-up parsing. In this guide, we will clarify the relationship between these two concepts and explore under which circumstances attributes can be computed during syntax tree creation.

What are L-Attributed Grammars?

L-attributed grammars are a specific type of context-free grammar that allows attributes (essentially pieces of information) to be associated with each grammar symbol during parsing. The “L” denotes that these attributes can be computed in left-to-right order during bottom-up parsing. This means that when you encounter a node in the parse tree, you can compute its attributes using only the attributes of its children—hence the term “L-attributed.”

Key Point:

L-attributed traits: Can be computed in a left-to-right manner while parsing, making them compatible with bottom-up parsing strategies.

Bottom-Up Parsing and Its Mechanics

Bottom-up parsing starts with the input symbols and attempts to build up the parse tree until it reaches the root. It is a popular parsing strategy due to its efficiency and ability to handle more complex grammars compared to top-down methods.

Characteristics of Bottom-Up Parsing:

Works from leaf nodes to root.

Constructs the parse tree incrementally.

Utilizes techniques that can handle grammars where multiple parser configurations (parse trees) may exist simultaneously.

Can We Always Compute Attributes?

The question arises: is it possible to compute all attributes during syntax tree creation for every context-free grammar, or is it restricted to certain types like LR(k)?

The General Case:

Constructing Parse Trees: If it's feasible to construct the parse tree bottom-up left-to-right, then computing L-attributes becomes straightforward. This is a tautology—if you can parse in this manner, you can compute the attributes accordingly.

Generalized LR Parsing: More complex parsing methods, such as generalized LR algorithms, can accommodate non-unambiguous grammars, meaning that there could be multiple valid parse trees for the same input. However, computing attributes at this point can be inefficient, particularly if they are computed prematurely, without confirmation of being part of the valid final parse tree.

Ambiguous Grammars: If the grammar is ambiguous, the number of potential parse trees can grow exponentially with the length of the input. This creates complications, especially when trying to assign attributes to nodes that might be intended for sharing across different parses.

Efficiency Concerns:

Calculating attributes before confirming their association with the final parse can lead to inefficiency.

The concern regarding side effects arises: if the parse tree structure is immutable during construction, assigning attributes may not be a side effect. However, if the tree is constructed in a way that is observable externally, this could complicate matters.

Conclusion

To wrap things up, L-attributed grammars provide a structured framework for computing attributes during bottom-up parsing. However, the feasibility of this computation relies heavily on the nature of the grammar being used. While L-attributed grammars facilitate left-to-right attribute computation, the complexities introduced by generalized parsing techniques and ambiguous grammars necessitate careful consideration.

In summary, if constructing your parse tree allows left-to-right traversal, computing attributes is