Скачать или смотреть Canadian Criminal Law | Automatism & Involuntary Acts | Chapter 14

🔗 Resources & Further Reading: https://www.crackncaexams.ca

📚 Essential Criminal Codes MANDATORY for NCA Canadian Criminal Law:
Pick yours:
https://amzn.to/3Jqao0h or,
https://amzn.to/3UtW2ly or,
https://amzn.to/3JvnGbM

📌 Efficient Note-Taking tags: Grab these handy tags for organized notes! Check them out here: https://amzn.to/3UvuEE0

🖊️ Markers for Tags: Perfect markers for your notes, available here: https://amzn.to/4d9O7Bp

🖊️ Highlighter for color coding important content on your notes, available here: https://amzn.to/3xUPZOj

⌨️ Speedy Keyboard: Upgrade your typing with this fast-response keyboard. Available here: https://amzn.to/4bacTzp

In this class, we dive into Chapter 14 of Canadian criminal law, focusing on the concept of "automatism" and involuntary acts that negate the actus reus. We explore the intricacies of the defense of automatism, its categories, and its implications in criminal cases. Through the examination of landmark cases such as R vs. Parks, R vs. Stone, and R vs. Luedecke, we gain insights into how the defense of automatism is applied and interpreted in various scenarios. Don't forget to subscribe and like the video for more in-depth classes on Canadian law!

Important Timestamps:

(00:00) Introduction to Canadian criminal law class.
(00:04) Overview of Chapter 14: Automatism and involuntary acts.
(00:29) Explanation of actus reus and its relation to the defense of automatism.
(01:03) Introduction to the defense of automatism.
(01:33) Categories of the defense of automatism.
(02:12) Challenges in obtaining acquittal based on non-mental disorder automatism.
(02:55) Case law discussion: R vs. Parks.
(05:06) Case law discussion: R vs. Stone.
(07:53) Case law discussion: R vs. Luedecke.
(10:43) Preview of the next class topic: Simple intoxication and specific intent crimes.
(10:46) Conclusion and farewell.

#canadianlaw #canadia #ncaexams