Скачать или смотреть Burnt Alive for Dowry: Supreme Court Reverses Acquittal After 24 Years | Dowry Death Case

A 20-year-old woman was burned alive for a TV, a motorcycle, and ₹15,000.
Twenty-four years later, the Supreme Court didn’t just punish the guilty it sent a message to the entire nation.

🔥 This is not just a judgment. This is a wake-up call.

In State of Uttar Pradesh v. Ajmal Beg & Anr. (2025 LiveLaw SC 1209), the Supreme Court revisited a chilling dowry death case from 2001, overturned a shocking High Court acquittal, restored life imprisonment for the husband, and issued nationwide directions to combat dowry deaths.

📌 What this video covers:
✔ Complete facts of the case what really happened behind closed doors
✔ Why the Allahabad High Court acquitted the accused
✔ How the Supreme Court exposed errors in reasoning
✔ Meaning of “soon before death” under Section 304B IPC
✔ Application of Section 113B Evidence Act (presumption of dowry death)
✔ Why poverty is NOT a defence against dowry demands
✔ The larger social and legal failure in preventing dowry deaths

⚖️ Key Laws Explained Simply:
• Section 304B IPC – Dowry Death
• Section 498A IPC – Cruelty
• Sections 3 & 4, Dowry Prohibition Act
• Section 113B, Indian Evidence Act

💡 This judgment goes beyond punishment it questions societal silence, judicial leniency, and the urgent need for accountability in dowry death cases.

📢 Watch till the end to understand how one case changed the way courts must approach dowry deaths across India.

👉 If you’re a law student, judiciary aspirant, lawyer, or someone who believes justice should be loud and uncompromising, this video is for you.

👍 Like | 💬 Comment your thoughts | 🔔 Subscribe for more Supreme Court case breakdowns