Скачать или смотреть EPC vs EPCM Contracts

EPC (Engineering, Procurement, and Construction) and EPCM (Engineering, Procurement, and Construction Management) are two common contracting models used in industrial and infrastructure projects. While they may seem similar, they have key differences in responsibilities, risk allocation, and project execution.

1. EPC (Engineering, Procurement, and Construction)
Definition: The contractor takes full responsibility for designing, procuring materials, and constructing the project. The contractor delivers a fully functional facility to the owner.
Contract Type: Lump sum or fixed-price contract (in most cases).
Responsibilities:
Engineering design
Procurement of materials and equipment
Construction execution
Commissioning and handover
Risk Allocation: The contractor bears most of the risk, including cost overruns and schedule delays.
Advantages:
Owner has minimal involvement.
Fixed price reduces financial risk.
Single point of responsibility ensures smooth project execution.
Disadvantages:
Less flexibility for the owner to make changes.
Higher cost due to contractor's risk premium.
Owner has less control over procurement and construction.

2. EPCM (Engineering, Procurement, and Construction Management)
Definition: The contractor provides engineering and procurement services while managing the construction phase on behalf of the owner. However, the owner signs direct contracts with suppliers and contractors.
Contract Type: Cost-reimbursable or fee-based contract.
Responsibilities:
Engineering and design
Procurement assistance
Construction management (but does not execute construction directly)
Risk Allocation: The owner bears more risk, including cost and schedule variations.
Advantages:
Greater flexibility for the owner.
Potential cost savings since there is no risk premium.
Owner retains control over the project.
Disadvantages:
Higher involvement required from the owner.
Greater exposure to cost overruns and schedule risks.
Owner must coordinate multiple contracts.