Dan Huff Analogy Explains Direct v. Circumstantial Evidence in Wrongful Death, Med Mal Trial

Описание к видео Dan Huff Analogy Explains Direct v. Circumstantial Evidence in Wrongful Death, Med Mal Trial

Huff Powell Bailey's Dan Huff explains direct and circumstantial evidence during closings at trial over a Georgia man's cancer death. Huff represented one of two defendant physicians accused of failing to properly treat a patient complaining of kidney issues. Jurors cleared both physicians of liability in the case.

Комментарии

Информация по комментариям в разработке

Похожие видео