Скачать или смотреть Resolving asyncio Python Coroutine Cancellation Issues with Redis Channels

Learn how to effectively manage asyncio tasks and prevent coroutine cancellations when using Redis channels. Discover solutions and best practices for handling connections and exceptions.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/70016675/ asked by the user 'nricks' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9962548/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/70350789/ provided by the user 'nricks' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9962548/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: asyncio python coroutine cancelled while task still pending reading from redis channel

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Resolving asyncio Python Coroutine Cancellation Issues with Redis Channels

In modern asynchronous programming with Python, using asyncio together with services like Redis can sometimes lead to unexpected errors and behaviors. One common issue developers face is the "Task was destroyed but it is pending!" error, which often indicates that coroutines managed by asyncio are being canceled unexpectedly while still pending execution. This guide will explore this issue in detail, and provide you with a well-structured solution to prevent it from occurring in your applications.

Understanding the Problem

When working with asyncio, creating multiple coroutines that are designed to wait for incoming messages through Redis channels can lead to complications if not handled properly. In a specific case, a developer noticed that after running their application for 24 hours, several "Task was destroyed but it is pending!" errors began to appear. These messages indicated that certain tasks were still pending when they were being terminated, likely due to cancellation or improper connection handling with Redis.

In this scenario, the developer was using a consumer coroutine that processes messages from a Redis queue, with subscribers that generate messages on different channels. The core issue seems to stem from the connection management with Redis, where connections could potentially hang or end unexpectedly, resulting in task cancellations.

Key Insights

Coroutines need robust exception handling to avoid premature cancellation.

Proper management of Redis connections is crucial to prevent resource leaks and task cancellations.

Proposed Solutions

After some investigation and testing, several approaches were developed to address the coroutine cancellation issue effectively. Here’s a breakdown of these solutions.

1. Improve Connection Management

One of the main steps taken was to ensure that Redis connections were managed correctly. Improperly closed connections can lead to a build-up of pending tasks and resource exhaustion. The following code additions were made to ensure connections are cleanly terminated:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This practice ensures that each Redis connection is properly closed and that the program waits for the connection to close before proceeding. Implementing this in both the consumer and subscriber helps maintain a stable connection with Redis.

2. Refactor Exception Handling

Enhancing exception management in the consumer and subscriber coroutines is essential to maintain application stability. Here’s how the exception handling logic was refactored in the consumer:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This structure ensures that:

The consumer continuously tries to read from the Redis queue within an infinite loop.

Errors are logged properly for future debugging.

The Redis connection is closed reliably in the finally block, regardless of whether an error occurs.

3. Update to the Latest Library Version

Keep in mind that library updates often include bug fixes and improvements. As of the writing of this post, a new major release of aioredis was available. Developers should consider updating to the latest version, as it may incorporate significant changes that improve performance and reliability.

Conclusion

Implementing the above strategies has successfully mitigated the issues of coroutine cancellations when working with Redis. After updates and refinements, the application has run smoothly for over two weeks without further errors. Proper connection management, enhanced error handling, and keeping libraries up to date are critical steps any devel