ANTI-GUN FEDERAL JUDGES CAUGHT INTENTIONALLY GAMING 2ND AMENDMENT CASE REVIEW...

The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied en banc review in a major 2nd Amendment case. Mark Smith Four Boxes Diner explains.

opinion: https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastor...


-----------------
TIMESTAMPS
-----------------

0:00 Anti-Gunners Pull Dirty Tricks
1:23 What Cases Federal Courts Are Allowed To Hear
2:19 How the 9th Circuit Used This...
4:22 Security Guard Loses His Job & Court Fallout
6:48 Why They Were Able To Do This & It Gets Worse
9:39 Judge VanDyke's Response & SCOTUS Future
13:56 Screwing Up Rahimi's Powerful 2A Conclusion
16:50 Thank You!

-----------------

Follow Along On Social Media
  / fourboxesdiner  

-----------------

The Four Boxes Diner serves up hot, fresh Second Amendment news and analysis. You’ll get the inside scoop from constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith, a member of the United States Supreme Court Bar, a professor, a frequent Fox News guest, and a New York Times bestselling author. Mark's books include The Official Handbook of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy, First They Came for the Gun Owners, and Duped: How the Anti-gun Lobby Exploits the Parkland School Shooting, and How Gun Owners Can Fight Back. Mark’s scholarship has been used by lawyers before the U.S. and his work has been quoted by a federal judge (Roger Benitez) in declaring California’s so-called “assault weapon” ban to be unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.

To defend your liberty, you need to understand the “four boxes” of American liberty: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the ammunition box. We give you the information you need, and we hope to serve as your source for Bill of Rights news and analysis.

-----------------
SUMMARY
-----------------