Скачать или смотреть Resolving the Issue of Python thread.join(timeout) Not Timing Out

Learn why `Python thread.join(timeout)` may not timeout as expected when using the threading module and how to fix it, including alternatives like multiprocessing.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/65667016/ asked by the user 'Fady' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/6737857/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/65669096/ provided by the user 'Kemp' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/3228591/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Python thread.join(timeout) not timing out

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Python thread.join(timeout) Not Timing Out

As developers, we often utilize threading to achieve concurrency in our applications. However, one common issue faced by many is when the join(timeout) method does not behave as expected and doesn't timeout. If you’ve ever found yourself waiting endlessly for a thread to finish, you’re not alone. In this post, we’ll examine this problem in detail and provide you with a practical solution to ensure your program handles timeouts properly.

The Problem

Consider the following scenario: You are using the threading module in Python to run a long-running function. You expect that if the function does not finish within a specified time limit, your program will continue executing. Here’s a snippet of the code that demonstrates the issue:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this example, the program does not reach the print statement “end” because the join() method waits indefinitely, making it seem like the timeout doesn’t work.

Why Does This Happen?

The core of the issue lies with Python’s Global Interpreter Lock (GIL). When a thread is executing a long-running operation, it may hold the GIL and not allow other threads to execute join(), resulting in the observed behavior. Essentially, the long-running calculation is seen as a single atomic operation, preventing the thread's timeout mechanism from functioning correctly.

The Solution

To resolve this issue, you can use one of two approaches:

1. Altering the Long-Running Function

The simplest fix is to modify the longFunc() so that it performs a series of operations instead of a single, intense calculation. A busy loop can be used as an example:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This modification allows the thread to yield control back to the interpreter, allowing join() to function as expected—meaning the timeout will work properly.

2. Switching to the Multiprocessing Module

Another effective approach is to utilize the multiprocessing module instead of threading. This can avoid the limitations imposed by the GIL, allowing for true parallel execution. Here’s an example of how to implement it:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

The issue of thread.join(timeout) not timing out can be frustrating, but understanding the role of the Global Interpreter Lock and using alternative approaches can help mitigate it. Whether you choose to modify your function to include multiple instructions or shift to a multiprocessing approach, both are effective solutions.

By making these adjustments, you can ensure that your applications can handle timeout scenarios as intended, leading to more robust and reliable multi-threaded applications in Python.