Скачать или смотреть Trump TRIES to ARREST JUDGE as Impeachment Articles FILED Within Minutes | | Rachel Maddow

A viral “what-if” story claims Donald Trump tried to have a federal judge arrested after an unfavorable ruling. Here’s the key point: that specific arrest scenario is framed as speculative, fictionalized commentary—not confirmed fact. But it feels plausible to many because it’s built on real, documented behavior: Trump’s public attacks on judges, reported retaliatory moves against legal opponents, and a widening congressional fight over judicial power. The script highlights new impeachment efforts in December 2025, including Rep. Al Green’s articles alleging abuse of power, incitement of violence, and threats involving the judiciary. It also notes Republicans filing impeachment articles against Judge James Boasberg after he blocked a Trump deportation plan—treating an unfavorable ruling as punishable, which undermines judicial independence. A central precedent is attorney Mark Zaid: Trump allegedly sought to revoke Zaid’s security clearance as retaliation, and a federal judge blocked it as improper political punishment. Together, these pieces form a “pincer” of executive intimidation and legislative retaliation that normalizes once-unthinkable escalations. The warning is about a dangerous feedback loop: repeated impeachment filings lose deterrent power, viral speculation shifts the Overton window, and the public becomes desensitized. With weakened guardrails, the ultimate check becomes voters—making 2026 a referendum on the rule of law and an independent judiciary.

#RachekMaddow #DonalTrump #JudicialIndependence #RuleOfLaw #Impeachment #USPolitics #ConstitutionalCrisis #2026Midterms