🔹 Hal Finney: The First True Bitcoiner
1. Proximity to Satoshi
• Hal was literally the first person after Satoshi to download, run, and improve Bitcoin’s code.
• He received the first ever Bitcoin transaction directly from Satoshi (10 BTC).
• His deep involvement from day one makes him a prime suspect.
2. Background
• A brilliant cryptographer and early cypherpunk.
• Created the first reusable proof-of-work system in the early 2000s, which Bitcoin’s mining system builds upon.
• Long history of discussing digital money, privacy, and crypto-anarchy.
3. Style and Location
• Linguists who analyzed Satoshi’s writing style noticed similarities with Hal’s emails and posts.
• Satoshi’s early timestamps often aligned with California time zones — where Hal lived.
4. Suspicious Timing
• Hal was diagnosed with ALS in 2009, right when Satoshi began disappearing from the project.
• Many theorize that Satoshi “vanished” because Hal’s illness made it impossible to continue.
⸻
🔹 Nick Szabo: The Godfather of Smart Contracts
1. Creator of Bit Gold
• In 1998, Szabo designed Bit Gold, which is almost a blueprint for Bitcoin: decentralized, timestamped, chained proof-of-work tokens.
• Many call it the “direct precursor” to Bitcoin.
2. Writings and Vision
• His blog posts before Bitcoin’s release read like Bitcoin manifestos.
• He wrote about “a decentralized digital currency” needing no third-party trust — almost identical to what Bitcoin became.
3. Linguistic Evidence
• Studies comparing Satoshi’s Bitcoin whitepaper with known writings show the closest match is Nick Szabo’s style.
• Even some technical phrases Satoshi used were identical to Szabo’s earlier works.
4. Anonymity Pattern
• Szabo has a history of pseudonymous publishing and secrecy.
• He has denied being Satoshi, but curiously in a way some interpret as evasive rather than categorical.
⸻
🔹 Why People Think It’s Both (Finney + Szabo)
1. Complementary Strengths
• Szabo was the theorist, laying out the ideas (Bit Gold, digital scarcity, trustless systems).
• Finney was the coder, capable of taking those ideas and making them into a working system.
• Together, they had exactly the right mix to create Bitcoin.
2. Linguistic Split
• Some of Satoshi’s writings look more like Szabo (conceptual, academic).
• Others look more like Finney (technical, code-focused).
• This fuels the theory that “Satoshi” was actually a team, not a single person.
3. Hal’s Location vs. Nick’s Writing
• Satoshi’s code updates matched Finney’s California timezone.
• The whitepaper itself matched Szabo’s writing style.
• Suggests Szabo might have drafted the whitepaper, and Finney implemented it.
4. Covering Tracks
• Both men were long-time cypherpunks and deeply valued privacy.
• If they teamed up, using the alias Satoshi Nakamoto would have been a way to deflect suspicion away from either of them individually.
⸻
🔹 Counterpoints
• Hal denied it: Finney, before his death in 2014, publicly stated he was not Satoshi, just an early helper.
• Nick denied it: Szabo has repeatedly denied being Satoshi, though in an oddly careful way.
• Some argue Satoshi’s English had British spelling, while both Hal and Nick are American — suggesting someone else entirely.
⸻
🏆 The Core Theory
If you combine everything:
• Szabo’s theory + vision (Bit Gold, blog posts, whitepaper style).
• Finney’s execution + coding skills (first to run it, cryptographic background, proof-of-work, timestamps, California location).
• The disappearance timeline matching Hal’s ALS diagnosis.
…it paints a very strong picture that Satoshi Nakamoto was either Hal Finney, Nick Szabo, or a collaboration between the two.
Информация по комментариям в разработке